10-4

Yeah the 2nd amendment is great until the Feds separate you from your piece and just shoot you anyways. But in principle yeah.

Canada's charter of rights was thrown out the door during the plandemic.

Good to have them codified, but the problem that people think their rights come from the law, rather than the law coming from the rights.

First Amendment Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. Second Amendment Right of the people to keep and bear arms. Third Amendment No quartering of soldiers in private homes without consent. Fourth Amendment Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures; warrants required. Fifth Amendment Rights to due process, protection against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and taking of property without just compensation. Sixth Amendment Right to a speedy and public trial, impartial jury, to know charges, confront witnesses, and have legal counsel. Seventh Amendment Right to a jury trial in civil cases. Eighth Amendment No excessive bail or fines, no cruel and unusual punishment. Ninth Amendment People have rights beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution. Tenth Amendment Powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people.

Sassy

Pop Question: Which one of these Amendments allows you to challenge a law?

First Amendment ✊🏽

Wrong it's actually the 5th. The right to due process. What most people don't know is there is a procedure called the procedure of ballots. It's a process that the public has to go through in order for the state or federal government to be forced into putting the law in a courtroom. The right to petition means you have the right to ask which can be told no. The procedure of ballots forces a law to be balloted in court to be removed completely or changed. To invoke the process is not easy at all it's probably the hardest process to invoke. The process is more designed to actually make it next to impossible for the public to invoke. According to the guidelines 60% of the states population needs to protest publically at the state congressmen's office with one represensative to give documentation to the state congressmen of the "official law in question" the documentation must outline the law specifically it's code, the problem it creates, how that problem affects the public, why it's considered a problem or danger, the purposal of change. An explanation on how this change benefits the public without disrupting the government, & last the demand to the senator by voice that code #### law blah blah blah we the public demand that this law be balloted in a court of law to be either changed or rescinded. Only then by the 5th amendment the right to due process forces this to have to be acknowledged by the governments & taken to a courtroom for ballot. They won't teach you this in school but you can learn about this by studying constitutional law.

In case you can't see the edit because your clients don't support it where I said senator I meant state congressmen.

Interesting. Do you have a source I can check out on that? A case name or statute maybe? I’m having trouble finding anything that ties that process to the Fifth Amendment.

Yes. But the Federalist had a decent worry that listening some such rights could be used to argue that those were the protected rights and to chip away at the wording of those.

I’m a fan of the bill of rights and the Ten Commandments, and I’m not religious

Freedom is fun, freedom is cool

We have additional rights that were not directly articulated in the US Constitution: - The Right to Exit - The Right to Verify - The Right to Fork - The Right to Sustain - The Right to Evolve

I'm a big fan of 5 of the 10 commandments.