Core changed the fundamental use-case of Bitcoin. It used to be a ledger, now it's storage. Changing the rules of what can be put on the network indirectly and profoundly changed the network.

Even 80IQ plebs know that shitcoin core v30 (aka malware) changed the Bitcoin from the arb data perspective but @ODELL continues to deny that because obviously he is a CORECUCK View quoted note →

Am I too dumb, or am I missing something? I thought that if the majority of people refuse to upgrade to #core30 or decide to run #knots, then the nodes will simply reject the those blocks with the core30 #OP_RETURN increased values as invalid / violarong the prior consensus, keeping the #bitcoin #timechain intact. Thus, if core devs want to still be relevant, they will kinda have to reverse the change. No need of a #softfork; no need of a #hardfork. #btc is freedom, and that means choice. The node-runners are free to choose.