Jumping off what I’ve read and seen in the last 24 hours regarding Saylor and the bitcoin space, I have some interesting food for thought.
If a fork in bitcoin was pushed by the large corporations, ETF custodians, and/or governments, then Saylor would be forced to play along. Which explains why he is talking the way he is now in contrast to when he came into Bitcoin.
Saylor might go from the hero of Epoch IV to the villain of Epoch V.
Login to reply
Replies (5)
I member the times when the 2017 fork happened.
I doubled my BTC stash because I redeemed the new BCH shitcoins and dump them on Ver for more BTC. Early days of the fork when was almost 1:1 rate.
I am waiting for Saylor to launch his fork and dump on him his worthless shitcoins....
You and me both 🤝
The new kids on the block (2020) don't know that was possible to double your stash 😄
What if, and hear me out, that this is Saylors end goal. He causes a fork dumps said shitcoin and doubles his company treasury btc holdings. Hiding behind the company as an economic decision not his solely....
I dont think this is what he would do but why not consider it. For my fellow stacking plebs, pay attention and maybe that 1/2 coin can become a whole.
Don't get drunk with water...
This is Saylors "end goal"