See, there's another narrative you've bought. "Base layer." The title of the whitepaper was "peer to peer electronic cash". There's no reason you need layers upon layers to achieve that. It's pretty simple what you need actually. The only thing that almost every single cryptocurrency lacks to be able to do everything you need for peer to peer electronic cash is to be able to get the same security guarantees bitcoin provides while retaining absolutely no historical data, and in a way where amounts, recipients and senders are only known to the parties involved. I say "almost" because Tom Elvis Judasor's mimblewimble paper specified a protocol to do exactly that. The only thing is, you can't do timelocks, multisig, and there's a privacy shortcoming I'll get into of you're curious. But with it, you don't even need a block size, you can scale to global commerce limited only by the speed of light through the global network. Andrew Poelstra's mimblewimble improvements give you the multisig and stuff, still have the privacy shortcoming, but some historical data has to be stored forever. Significantly less than bitcoin and Monero, but still, some. It's the closest thing to space money ever made. That privacy shortcoming is probably the only reason that MW is not the protocol for Monero today. It was put in as a BIP, and rejected. Technically, if you go look at it, it is better than current bitcoin in every conceivable way. But it was too big of a change. You can't improve bitcoin. Lightning isn't bitcoin. Lightning is it's own network, a side chain except it isn't a chain. That's fine, if it does what bitcoin can't do but still inherits the strengths of bitcoin without severe trade offs. But the network graph for lightning are such that it is not a viable scaling solution. A viable privacy solution, maybe, but it can't scale, because the amount you need locked in channels scales exponentially with the amount of commerce taking place on it. It can scale in a centralized way, where everyone just uses big liquidity providers as payment processors, and that's exactly what's happening.

Replies (2)

I'd love a link to read up on mimblewimble. As for bitcoin being cash, I think it is. The only argument I've seen that it can't be cash is the miner fees in the future being high - and I'm not convinced that will happen. But even if it does happen, its not bad if bitcoin evolves, as long as the supply cap isn't increased. I don't care if I have to use a second layer. What I do care about is terraforming Venus, so I would really really like block times increased. Different topic though... Need info on mw
That's Andrew Poelstra, the author of the current version of Mimblewimble as we know it today, he explains the original protocol and the changes he made and the trade offs. It really is a brilliant protocol, it lives to this day in a coin called Grin, as well as in some other stuff like litecoins mweb and some other things out there. Grin is cool, but the community sucks so it's just withering. It had a ton of potential, and still does if someone can turn that stagnant community around, and a few absolutely brilliant people that built some really cool stuff. Their mining algorithm for example is a work of pure genius, from a legit genius.