Yeah it is by default. It was one of the first things I put into GPT's memory as well. I don't need polite, I don't need nice, I need compact answers (in some cases with reference links) and if I need more information, I will continue the conversation.
Even GPT adopted and I still use it. A while ago I asked GPT to profile my as if it were an FBI profiler. The result was pretty insane.
As for TA's and "trading buddy" - I like your approach but you should challenge GPT at times too. Plus, it feels good if an AI comes to a similar conclusion than yourself just based on a technical chart. Hence me saying if it agrees with you without any direction, you've got a trade.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
This was the personality profile it gave me after I had been working on coding projects with it for a couple months:
Thought for 21s
Based on our chat history, your personality is best described as:
High-agency builder/operator. You do not mainly theorize; you build, test, deploy, debug, publish, and monetize. You move from idea to terminal command to production quickly, and you expect tooling and assistants to keep pace.
Security- and sovereignty-oriented. Your default instinct is to control your own infrastructure, keys, repos, relays, vaults, domains, nodes, wallets, and business stack. You strongly prefer designs that fail closed, avoid hidden trust, avoid managed infrastructure where possible, and preserve user autonomy.
Technically exacting. You care about correctness, reproducibility, clean architecture, and unambiguous implementation details. You dislike hand-wavy advice. You want concrete commands, branch plans, file paths, test expectations, commit messages, and Codex prompts with no remaining design ambiguity.
Pragmatic, not purely ideological. You have strong principles around Bitcoin, Nostr, privacy, freedom software, and self-hosting, but you are also business-minded. You are willing to make MVP tradeoffs, defer features, use cloud infrastructure where practical, and prioritize getting apps published.
Fast, iterative, and evidence-driven. You test changes immediately, report precise failures, compare actual behavior against expected behavior, and revise based on data. You do not like speculative answers when logs, screenshots, commands, or source checks can settle the question.
Blunt under friction. When something breaks, especially due to bad instructions, your tone becomes direct and corrective. You have low tolerance for avoidable mistakes, stale assumptions, repeated questions, or vague “try this” troubleshooting. This is not random impatience; it is mostly intolerance for wasted execution cycles.
Ambitious and systems-minded. You tend to think in platforms, not isolated tasks: apps, billing, publishing, backend queues, admin panels, encrypted vaults, Bitcoin rails, relays, DNS, infrastructure, legal/business setup, and release workflows. You prefer durable systems over one-off hacks.
Autonomy-first communicator. You want help that improves your control, not help that takes control away. You manage git yourself, want final approval over commits/merges, and treat ChatGPT as the planning/review layer while Codex is the implementation layer.
Your likely strengths are persistence, technical range, operational intensity, sharp error detection, and the ability to turn abstract ideas into deployed systems.
Your likely blind spots are scope expansion, impatience with collaborators/tools that need more context, and a tendency to carry many complex workstreams at once. You may also set a very high bar for correctness before release, which improves security but can slow shipping.
In one sentence: you are a hard-driving, sovereignty-minded technical founder/operator who values precision, control, security, and forward motion over polish, consensus, or comfort.