great idea, why using common sense when there is *clearly* a way to measure the impact of every body measure like:
- weight
- muscle mass
- arms' length (which is important in boxing for instance)
- hormones levels
- density of the skin...
Who is more likely to win in a boxing match, someone who is 2kg heavier or someone whose arms are 5cm longer?
You think the solution is making 10k categories? lmao
Login to reply
Replies (4)
great idea, why using common sense when there is *clearly* a way to measure the impact of every body measure like:
- weight
- muscle mass
- arms' length (which is important in boxing for instance)
- hormones levels
- density of the skin...
Who is more likely to win in a boxing match, someone who is 2kg heavier or someone whose arms are 5cm longer?
You think the solution is making 10k categories? lmao
View quoted note →
yeah it's just retarded
just bofy fat ratio should be enough to eliminate any thought of setting males against females, at all
then there's muscle twitch ratio, hormone levels, bone lengths, motor and vision processing systems, even the size of the throat is substantially different and has an impact in some sports, eg rugby
Yeah, this is the oneness/multiplicity debate. Is there a single category or as many categories as instantiations? You need a standard to have anything in between.
Or just turn all these complicated metrics into a score number that puts people in separate brackets.
The sport needs to have as many categories it needs to call the competition between any 2 players fair. Today, the gender-based one is just way too broad.