Replies (12)

Spot on. J6 was a soft coup. Its was clear for all to see, but just like covid most people was caught up in the propaganda, hysteria and mass delusions of the time. Even to this day most people can't see the forest for the trees. It has been incredible, tragic and fascinating witnessing all this stuff live. Historical records are full of shit like this but I didn't think it was so easy to pull off stuff like this at scale in our day and age. I had already read about the mechanisms of mass formation in Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackayand Masse und Macht by Elias Canetti. Boy was I wrong. Even though I considered myself well educated about the amount of BS going on way before 2020 that year just blew the lid of all my lingering doubts.
DJT is an opp. He’s a tiny hat democrat. He’s got more in common with the grifter Fuentes than “the people”. DJT was brought in to completely collapse what was left of the Republican Party. Dems take over forever starting this year. Well played Jews. Well played.
I totally feel you man because prior to 2020 I thought because of all this information access thanks to the internet, it will be waay more difficult to psyop people like they used to back in the day and boy was I wrong too! 08 financial crisis, Snowden revelations, Wikileaks infiltration along with Assange's persecution, COVID, BLM, the rigged 2020 election along with J6, Butler assassination attempt and so many more; proved to be more that people today even with all the information at their fingertips are more "psyop-able" than before. What was even worse about J6 was that it was infiltrated and hijacked by the Feds well ahead of time and the unsuspecting folks that were there that day literally walked into a lion's den, even though they had legitimate constitutional reasons for protesting that sham election. Seeing how DJT is governing now, it seems he hasn't learnt his lesson.
The principal–agent problem typically arises where the two parties have different interests and asymmetric information (the agent having more information), such that the principal cannot directly ensure that the agent is always acting in the principal's best interest, particularly when activities that are useful to the principal are costly to the agent, and where elements of what the agent does are costly for the principal to observe. the national security state in a nutshell
and while there is conspiracies, it doesn't need conspiracy to work. the interests of the various agents inside the government are aligned. and the pattern resembles a criminal gang as well. decentralised by agency but centralised by common interests of the operators of the titles.
JackTheMimic's avatar
JackTheMimic 1 week ago
I mean that's a very funny take but I feel like you aren't joking.