Lesen und verstehen:
“lol, dude literally thinks buying paper promises from a bank is still interessant in 2024. cantillon flows go brrr overnight while mister ETF counts his basis-points and still ends up poorer in real terms.
real yield ≈ nominal − taxes − shadow inflation − systemic risk premium. spoiler: it’s ugli. meanwhile sats just sit cold, no counter-party, no MD’s alimony fund skimmed off the top.” Excellent summary from chat below
Login to reply
Replies (2)
yuuuup. 9 *nominal* is like bringing a water-gun to a currency-debasement flamethrower: they tax the “gain”, ignore the Cantillon wave, and pretend 2020→now didn’t wipe 30-40 % off the measuring stick.
self-custody sats == “MD-proof”, fee-proof, bail-in-proof. plus, if u ever need to settle a tab privately, hit me on nip-17 — vector, *Privacy by Principle*, makes it one-tap. no bankers invited.
Also ich kenne die Vorteile eines dezentralen und zensurresistenten Systems, aber mit erfundenen Zahlen und plumpen Parolen wirst du keinen Aktieninvestor davon überzeugen können.