and to compare this, with /r/Bitcoin splits and even various state and city splits. This solution does the split seemlessly with no lost content. The split happens at the relay level .. People want moderation, nobody wants to have everyone to have to view some dickpick spam to decide if it's related to /r/Buttcoin or not. See what I mean? 10,000 people viewing and and blocking it individually, vs a mod team delegated to do that. It's opt-in, with no being trapped like you are on a platform. This is what made IRC and then reddit work, is moderation and this is the least platformish way you could possibly do it imho.. (better than those).

Replies (1)

The only way I see to make moderated relays palatable to me is if they allow mirroring all events to a backup relay. So if relay A censors valid opinions on r/Bitcoin again, relay B can serve the same topic with different policy and take over those who get censored at A. People agreeing with this moderation can remain at A but people at B won't miss out on all the other notes that aren't censored at A. Ideally clients would allow following topics on more than one relay at a time.