Well I'm not sure how much do you know about the rear earth minerals processing plants, but I'm still not convinced that the CO2 emissions are worse than the toxic waste of these plants. So if the waste of nuclear energy is harmful, the waste of internal combustion engine is harmful and the waste of production for the solar panels and wind turbines are toxic. Which one is better for energy generation?

Replies (1)

Very clearly wind tourbines and solar power. They are renewable. You can reuse their compounds again and again. The mining problems are locally. So it can may have influence on a couple of thousands or some million people. Global warming has influence on all ecosystems. So in one or the other way on all human beings, animals and plants of this earth. It will inevitably cause mass migration the world did not have encountered yet. And the world will offer less opportunities for life in total. So I have no doubt, that the emission of carbon dioxide is the biggest cause of future wealth destruction. And the reduction of its emission can lower the most harm in the world. The total productivity of our world has its roots in the opportunities for life. When less life is possible, less wealth is possible. And no speach in the world and no oppinion will change a damn thing in this reality.
โ†‘