For one thing, I did not build this UX.
There is always a push and pull between UX, feature-creep, and "invisible" software quality.
As far as I can tell, you have a gripe with a few pixels of layout, colors, or button styles. This isn't even UX. You're talking about a few nearly insignificant design and aesthetic preferences.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Design aesthetics are not insignificant. Ask anyone in marketing - there’s an entire science behind why users choose one look and feel over another. If good design doesn’t harm decentralization, there’s absolutely no reason not to optimize for it. The digital experience is largely visual, and visual experience is part of user experience. Building something that simply “works” isn’t enough - unless you’re shipping for other devs who live in terminal windows and think usability is optional. For everyone else, design is the bridge between function and adoption. If you can’t see the difference between these, and decide what feels better from a glance, then you probably wouldn’t understand what I mean.


I need to say that design means a lot. I would never user Nostur due to its colours and design... gives me a headache. Wouldnt want to stare at that one.