Let's see:
All Bitcoin developers or people close to Bitcoin who appear in Epstein's papers:
- Have contributed to legitimizing chain spam and attempting to erase the essence of Bitcoin, which is peer-to-peer money transfer.
- Have contributed to the development and adoption of stablecoins.
- Have contributed to creating shitcoins or creating chains that support shitcoins.
Don't give me that crap, you're defending the indefensible, many of you are fucking bootlickers.
Replies (9)
I could go through them one by one, but the most relevant case is Blockstream. Clearly, all of its developers support spam, and Liquid, from being a Bitcoin sidechain, has transformed into a chain that supports stablecoins and shitcoins.
I realize this is a serious issue. I just had to relieve it with some humor imagining those guys like this.
Thank you for your reporting, Cypher. 🤜🤛
Which persons are involved?
So far I’ve seen Adam Back, Matt Corallo, Bryan Bishop, Vladimir van der Laan, Gavin Andresen. There are probably more.
woundn't even show in my timeline/been fading notes like this for years now/nostr
