Is it inherently bad to want the base layer of a monetary system to be as ossified and unchangeable as possible?
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Not necessarily. But Bitcoin is a social phenomenon and unlike gold that can not be altered under any circumstances every social construct is fallabke and or can be changed.
Ossification too early in ones lifecycle is just as bad as having no social consensus structirecat all.
no. it's not even close to being finished and anyone who thinks otherwise is completely delusional.
how does a static, ossified ANYTHING succeed within a changing, dynamic context?
so I don't think it's bad to *want that.
it's just that unlikely to be a good thing.
change or die.