Thread

In Chapter Two of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, we’re introduced to a chilling practice of conditioning from infancy. Infants are subjected to electric shocks and loud noises while recordings play, instilling an aversion not only to books and nature but also fostering divisions between different social classes. For instance, Beta, Gamma, and Alpha children are conditioned to develop biases against one another, reinforcing the rigid caste system and ensuring societal stability. Fast forward to today, and we find echoes of this conditioning in how algorithms shape our online experiences. Social media platforms, often working hand-in-hand with powerful entities, subtly influence what we see, what we believe, and how we interact with each other. The constant stream of tailored content, along with discouragement of independent research, mirrors that kind of subconscious programming. And just as Huxley’s society used conditioning to divide and control, today’s algorithms can stoke division and deepen societal rifts, often without us even realizing it. In both worlds, the result is a population conditioned to accept its place, limiting independent thought and reinforcing the status quo. It’s a powerful reminder of how important it is to remain vigilant and critical in our consumption of information.

In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the phrase “everyone belongs to everyone else” encapsulates a society that promotes complete promiscuity and the absence of personal attachments. In Chapter 3, we see this cultural norm in action, with characters engaging in casual relationships and seeing monogamy as outdated or even frowned upon. Bernard Marx, however, stands out as someone who feels discomfort and alienation in this environment. His unease reflects his longing for genuine, meaningful connections and his resistance to the superficiality of his society. This tension in the novel mirrors modern discussions about relationships today. In contemporary culture, we often see a celebration of casual dating and the idea of not being tied down. Bernard’s character invites us to reflect on the value of deeper emotional bonds and the consequences of a society that prioritizes instant gratification over genuine connection. In essence, Bernard’s struggle highlights a timeless tension between societal norms and individual desires, making Brave New World as relevant today as it was when it was first published. #TimePreference

In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley envisioned a society where conditioning and artificial happiness reigned supreme. Through methods like hypnopaedia, ectogenesis, and soma, the World State maintained control and ensured stability. Today, we can draw fascinating parallels to our own world. Our smartphones and screens have become modern-day equivalents of soma, providing instant comfort and distraction. We’re conditioned by our devices, often developing Pavlovian responses to notifications and constant information flow. Just as the World State suppressed older literature to maintain control, we also see a shift in how information is consumed and filtered today, often leading to echo chambers and passive absorption. It’s a thought-provoking lens through which to view our own society and how technology shapes our behavior and culture.

In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley delves into the complex dichotomy of savagery and civilization through the lens of monogamy and promiscuity. Linda, from the World State, finds herself in the Savage Reservation, where more traditional and communal values prevail. Her behavior, which includes multiple partners, is seen as shocking and even savage by the reservation’s women, who uphold monogamous norms. This clash profoundly impacts John, Linda’s son, as he navigates his identity between these two worlds. This theme of cultural clash and judgment is still relevant today. For instance, children of OnlyFans creators can face similar ridicule and social stigma, much like John did. The judgment and differing cultural norms highlight how societies define what is considered acceptable or savage, and how those definitions shape individuals’ lives. #BraveNewWorld #AldusHuxley

In Chapter 9 of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, we witness John’s complex reaction to Lenina, whose beauty and innocence captivate him. However, this innocence is not purely physical; it’s more about her mental state, shaped by a society that values conformity and superficial pleasure over genuine emotional depth. This dynamic reflects a broader theme: in our own world, we often see a similar dichotomy. While physical intimacy and openness have become more common, there can still be a mental innocence, a lack of deeper reflection or critical thinking. In other words, while we may be physically liberated, our minds can remain sheltered or unchallenged. In Brave New World, this juxtaposition between physical experience and mental innocence serves as a powerful commentary on the consequences of a society that prioritizes pleasure over meaningful thought. It’s a thought-provoking exploration of how we navigate the complexities of human nature in an increasingly superficial world.

The Fragile Ego: Bernard’s Rise and Fall in Brave New World In Brave New World, Bernard Marx is a character whose fortunes shift dramatically thanks to an unexpected turn of events. When Bernard brings back John and Linda, he inadvertently saves himself from demotion to Iceland, as the spectacle of John calling the Director “father” sparks laughter and shifts the power dynamics. This moment not only saves Bernard’s career but also inflates his ego, leading him down a precarious path. However, as Bernard becomes more consumed by his newfound popularity, he starts to lose touch with those who once supported him, especially Helmholtz. The very ego that saved him becomes his undoing, as it leads to isolation and a kind of hubris that blinds him to the dangers around him. In the end, Bernard’s story is a poignant reminder that ego is not always an ally; it can often pave the way for one’s downfall. This theme resonates deeply, both in the world of the novel and in our own lives, reminding us to keep humility in check and to remain aware of the thin line between success and hubris.

In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, Bernard Marx is a character who grapples with the tension between individuality and societal conformity. While Bernard initially enjoys the perks of social acceptance, his encounter with John the Savage highlights his internal conflict. When John refuses to be paraded as a spectacle, it deflates Bernard’s ego and exposes his vulnerability. This mirrors a key lesson from Robert Greene’s The 48 Laws of Power: the idea that one should conform publicly while maintaining private dissent. Bernard’s downfall is a poignant reminder that authenticity and societal expectations often clash in dystopian worlds—and sometimes in our own.

The Clash of Social Norms: From “Brave New World” to Modern Society In Aldous Huxley’s dystopian classic “Brave New World,” the scene where Lenina attempts to seduce John the Savage is a pivotal moment. Lenina, conditioned by a world of instant gratification and casual intimacy, approaches John with the expectation of a similar, uncommitted encounter. However, John, raised with more traditional and moral values, reacts with shock and horror. His emotional and ethical framework makes it impossible for him to engage in the same way Lenina expects. This clash highlights the stark contrast between the two worlds: one of emotional depth and moral codes, and the other of superficial pleasure and immediate gratification. When we look at modern society, we notice some parallels. Today, there’s a strong emphasis on individualism and freedom, with many people embracing casual relationships and prioritizing personal growth. It’s not uncommon for people to focus on their careers, travel, and personal experiences before seeking long-term commitment. However, as people get older, the desire for stability and meaningful connections often becomes stronger. This can create a challenge, as the pool of potential partners who share those traditional values can feel smaller and harder to find. In both cases, the tension between modern norms and traditional values can lead to misunderstandings and missed connections. The key takeaway is that, whether in Huxley’s world or our own, understanding and empathy are crucial in navigating the complexities of human relationships.

In “Brave New World,” Linda’s final moments unfold in a sort of hospice-like setting, where she faces death surrounded by a cold, detached society. Her son, John, comes to see her, and his grief is palpable, reflecting a deep, genuine human connection that the World State’s citizens simply cannot understand. The twins and the citizens of London, conditioned to remain emotionally detached, can never truly feel the bond of family or the pain of loss that John experiences. This stark contrast highlights how the World State suppresses genuine human connections in favor of superficial harmony. In many ways, this theme resonates with our own world today. We often find ourselves becoming increasingly detached through technology, social media, and even substance use. The erosion of genuine human connection is something many of us experience, and it serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of fostering real, meaningful relationships in our own lives.

In Chapter 15 of “Brave New World,” John is at Park Lane Hospital for the Dying, where his mother, Linda, has just passed away right in front of him. Disturbed by the hospital’s cold, detached atmosphere and the citizens’ indifference to death, John passionately protests the distribution of soma, the drug used to pacify people. He throws the soma on the ground and urges the patients to reject it, seeking genuine human emotion and freedom. This act sparks a chaotic confrontation, with the hospital staff and patients turning on John. Helmholtz and Bernard arrive and only Helmholtz joins John in resisting, while Bernard Marx stands by passively. Eventually, the police intervene, dispersing soma gas to calm everyone down and arresting John, Helmholtz, and Bernard. This scene underscores the conflict between individuality and the World State’s control, highlighting the struggle for authentic human experiences. In “Brave New World,” John’s insistence on rejecting soma mirrors the modern call for people to disconnect from their screens and embrace real-world interactions. Just as John challenges the numbing effects of soma and urges people to feel genuine emotions, we often encourage others to put their phones down and experience life directly. In both scenarios, the goal is to break free from artificial distractions and to reconnect with authentic human experiences. The conflict in both cases arises from the tension between superficial comfort and the messy, but meaningful, reality of human emotions. In essence, both John’s rebellion and our modern-day calls for mindfulness serve as reminders that true connection and genuine experience are vital to our humanity. #BraveNewWorld

In Brave New World, the pivotal conversation between Mustapha Mond and John the Savage delves into the nature of human struggle. John believes that struggle is essential for authentic human experience, fostering growth, resilience, and genuine emotion. For him, it’s through hardship that we find meaning and true individuality. On the other hand, Mustapha Mond argues that stability and happiness are achieved by eliminating conflict and discomfort. In this controlled world, the absence of struggle ensures societal harmony, but at the cost of depth and authentic human experience. In 2025, this debate feels incredibly relevant. As technology and consumerism abstract our lives, many of us become detached from the tangible outcomes of our work and the deeper struggles that shape us. The conversation between John and Mond is a powerful reminder of the importance of embracing challenge and complexity, even in our modern, convenience-driven world.

In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, John the Savage’s journey is one of profound conflict and tragedy. After being introduced to the highly controlled and conformist society of the World State, John attempts to find refuge from the overwhelming influence of this new world. He isolates himself in a lighthouse, seeking solitude and a return to a more authentic way of living. However, the clash between his own values and the superficial stability of the World State leads to immense inner turmoil. Consumed by guilt and self-loathing, John turns to self-flagellation as a way to cope with his emotions and his perceived failings. Despite his attempts to reconcile his identity with the society around him, he ultimately finds himself unable to escape the psychological burden. In the end, John’s despair becomes too great, and he chooses to take his own life, a poignant and tragic resolution to his story. Through John’s character, Huxley explores themes of individuality, freedom, and the cost of a utopian society.