Okay, that's interesting and I knew I'd seen someone post about it recently, I just couldnt remember who it was. @HoloKat, if I may, what's the difference between 31337 and this proposal? Is there an advantage? I'm wondering, because plume is successfully pulling 31337 types now, and presenting them well, but I don't know who is implementing them elsewhere or what any possible disagreement may be.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
31337 was the old zapstr...
I have vague memories - the notes are still there, to some extent, so couldnt we just continue to use that kind? Does @HoloKat proposed NIP offer an advantage?