Many bitcoiners think establishment powers are now in the "and then they join you" phase of the struggle. I don't. I think they're more entering the earlier "and then they fight you" phase. Or more specifically, they are happy to join in on the price exposure side (i.e. ETFs), but they are fighting against privacy (especially) and self-custody (to some extent). The struggle for financial privacy, custody, and overall self-autonomy is just heating up. The gradual shift of critics from "bitcoin is a useless speculative asset with no intrinsic value" to "bitcoin is so powerful that direct usage of it must be curtailed" can be dangerous. image

Replies (12)

I'm also of the opinion that the fight is only just beginning. And I suspect we will see more government involvement as it becomes apparent that too many plebs will have a seat at the new table.
I'm super black-pilled on the privacy bit. It feels like all hope is lost to achieve any meaningful on-chain improvements for privacy now that the ETF BlackRock suits are on board.
This ruling class is so old itโ€™s hard to tell when theyโ€™ve landed a blow. image
Good, privacy should be an opt in feature. If privacy is on the base layer verification is difficult or impossible. Proof of reserves is no longer feasible. Some entities should be acting publicly. Bitcoin with layers flips traditional banking, in which the individuals have no privacy but the institutions can move invisibly behind the scenes.
100% yes. The worst part of the "then they fight you" is still to come.
โ†‘