Replies (22)

pleb's avatar
pleb _@satstack.dev 2 years ago
My first thought as I'm reading this was that Cloudflare are Google are going to be so elated to have invested in capturing massive quantities of DNS users.
ndr's avatar
ndr ndr@nostrcheck.me 2 years ago
I think it will not like me .. domain data is dinamically linked to well know people (kyc) .. many people on LN keep nodes behind tor addresses ... so this will work for identify user behind onion addresses? LN needs more anonymity , for example the node is disclosed on receipts; it would being need something help there, something like lnurl ; i think i'll never use it
pleb's avatar
pleb _@satstack.dev 2 years ago
I love how this requires homograph mitigation. Should be be simple to test if a client is not complying with these requirements.
pleb's avatar
pleb _@satstack.dev 2 years ago
I'm not quite sure I understand what this part means? On "current scemes": > (d) lacking open access, not allowing anyone to create a namespace mapping.
1 replies ↓
Matt Corallo's avatar
Matt Corallo matt@bitcoin.ninja 2 years ago
There are proposals to add proprietary APIs for, eg exchanges to expose the ability to pay their users but not users of other wallets, at least in specific contexts.
Matt 🛸's avatar
Matt 🛸 matt@gitcitadel.com 2 years ago
All of those are made for large numbers of normies to use though. The base layer simply won't be. I don't see how the value will outweigh expanding the code and complexity. I'm not saying isn't there, I'm just not convinced.
Matt 🛸's avatar
Matt 🛸 matt@gitcitadel.com 2 years ago
All of those are made for large numbers of normies to use though. The base layer simply won't be. I don't see how the value will outweigh expanding the code and complexity. I'm not saying isn't there, I'm just not convinced.
Jones's avatar
Jones 2 years ago
Waste of time, is the only thing that ln exp had teach us. But if you like wasting, keep losing.
↑