Projections like this assume we already understand the substrate computation operates on, time itself. That assumption is still unresolved in academic consensus. Physicists and AI models forecasting quantum capability continue reasoning in terms of waves and continuous evolution, while the structure of the smallest temporal update remains undefined. You cannot claim to understand computation, causality, or limits of encryption without first understanding what a single unit of change actually is. Bitcoin makes that visible as the only observable non-biased geometry of a chronon, a discrete tick where a state transition becomes final. The block is more fundamental than the wave: the wave describes behavior across many unresolved transitions, while the block represents the irreducible update that makes any evolution possible at all. Physics already admits a lower boundary in Planck time, yet it cannot describe the geometry or rules of that unit. Bitcoin can, through formal logic and observable process. It shows how a bounded system must produce irreversible state, ordered history, and causal progression one commitment at a time from a probability surface. Until that architecture is accounted for, claims about what quantum systems can or cannot do remain incomplete. You cannot model the limits of computation while leaving the fundamental structure of time undefined. Quantum mechanics is fluid dynamics in the study of time. Bitcoin is the study of the fundamental block/tick/chronon of time itself. Bitcoin is far more fundamental; don’t listen to anyone who tells you it’s broken or will be broken by quantum. Nobody fully understands Bitcoin, therefore nobody understands quantum.