The smart move in the future will be to return to small blocks. Small blocks encourage miner decentralization. Bitcoin's current big blocks are useful only for keeping transactions fairly fast - yes, 10 min + 2 confirmation is fast for a base layer, very fast. But now we have lightning, and I don't think lightning is finished developing either, and I don't see any reason why we can't have a layer 2 atop 1mb blocks. The current priority is gaining adoption ; the future priority should be more decentralization. Smaller blocks = more miner decentralization. It is possible that going back to 1 mb won't be needed, if base layer demand is high. But I think its important that the current spam is the thing that makes these big blocks viable. If you want to cut the spam, go back to 1 mb and let high fees price them out.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
the monumentally stupid idea that downgrading from 3.5" floppy disks to 5.25" floppy disks, in the year of our lord 2026, will save us from mining centralization
and just how fucking centralized do you want the lying notwork to be??
View quoted note →