Replies (34)

Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Compromised not hacked. Words matter. no way that was a compromised
I thought it was a fat finger too, till I saw this 😂 Yeah maybe it was a hack image
#nostr fixes this. CNBC is now saying it was a twitter hack at twitter. Not an SEC hack or account breach.
ARVIN's avatar
ARVIN 2 years ago
SEC forgot to update their scheduled posts
maybe the goal of this “hack” was to try to drive down the price, keep prices low(er), and avoid a fomo pump when the “real” announcement is made now that new money will second guess any future announcements… or they’re just incompetent… scratch that…this is the SEC and Gary we’re talking about…they’re definitely just that incompetent.
I've been saying that that was the tweet in draft that got posted early. it was worded too well for a 'compromise'
@jack how long would the account recovery normally take? Suss af the post was left up for 20 mins. They regained account control in 20 mins? BS
bitcoinflood's avatar
bitcoinflood 2 years ago
Just a dry run and market manipulation by the government and SEC to see what would happen if they do approve it
🌹's avatar
🌹 2 years ago
You was right again 💪🏽
Apparently it was: "We can confirm that the account @SECGov was compromised and we have completed a preliminary investigation. Based on our investigation, the compromise was not due to any breach of X’s systems, but rather due to an unidentified individual obtaining control over a phone number associated with the @SECGov account through a third party," said X Safety. "We can also confirm that the account did not have two-factor authentication enabled at the time the account was compromised. We encourage all users to enable this extra layer of security. More information and tips on how to keep your account secure can be found in our Help Center."