We are currently working on the @MedSchlr landing page and will start reaching out to nostr users as well as non-nostr users ( i. e. medical and health professionals, researchers, health enthusiasts, and organizations) who are interested in improving open science, decentralization, and scientific peer-review to: 1) start using MedSchlr to help populate the knowledge base by publishing articles, commenting, and sharing relevant works; 2) form knowledge communities of interest (e.g. biohackers, researcher-led ones like peer-review, evidence synthesis, etc.) 2) generate user feedback to help @liminal ๐Ÿฆ  and @GitCitadel team identify areas of improvement and features. Hopefully by the end of September or October we will be able to launch the landing page to start this initial phase of MedSchlr. @paul keating and those interested in medical and health science knowledge it would be great to have your help in sharing the MedSchlr landing page once it is ready and help spread the word! In the meantime, feel free to reach out to us by commenting @MedSchlr or on the charter: note1rwmfjt5caawxjgkk9504qkee350xyvgqrh20zy6v09tkrtan2hrs45ked4

Replies (3)

The best thing for @MedSchlr experts can do right now is just write about their ideas on nostr, especially like long form blog/article. Nostr has pluralism (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralism) baked into its very core, so MedSchlr aims to embrace and amplify that as a medical+health+science+research+education focused knowledge commons. Sharing your ideas, providing thoughtful criticisms is the best way to facilitate the growth and efficacy of MedSchlr. #Alexandria, as a base nostr client brings it all in for further conversation and idea evolution.
โ†‘