True, it always requires explanation, but calling whole coins Bitcoin and sats Bitcoin cannot be explained.

Bitcoin should be used for the monetary system and the whole coin in my opinion

Then we will have micro-bits? It will have to be divided further eventually.

That is confusing and I don't know of a better way around it, but in the future most people will never own 1 full bitcoin so to me it makes sense in the long run and that to me is less confusing than trying to explain an unrelated term. Since Bitcoin has a lot of marketing power and brand recognition, it makes sense to utilize that since the masses aren't aware of the 'sats'.

Bitcoin, with a capital B is usually used for the whole ecosystem and network, while bitcoin with lowercase b is used for the monetary asset.

I'm sure you're a nice guy, but who TF cares? Following your logic, they may not know what a sat is, but they MAY know the market value of one bitcoin if they're LiTeRaLly paying in bitcoin via Square. Having a coffee be 6,000 bitcoins is just DUMB. Either A. Use sats B. Use bitcoins Don't use A but call it B 🤦🏻‍♂️

😂 Love all of you guys @corndalorian

It takes work and time to understand sats . I love bitcoiners that know lightning and use "stack sats and stay humble" 🤌⚡️

not everyone refers to 0.01 of X currency unit as a cent either by using the bitcoin symbol you are creating confusion by overlapping 2 definitions an unknown concept takes only 30 seconds to explain

This’ll help. 🤨 It certainly won’t make it more confusing View quoted note →

Sats are to bitcoin as cents are to dollars Anyone can understand that