@jack I am incredibly excited about this rollout and it's a huge win for Bitcoin, but this is ridiculous. At least call them bits instead of bitcoin if you want your power trip. I don't know a single person (bitcoiner or normie) who isn't confused by calling sats bitcoins.
The Daniel πŸ––'s avatar The Daniel πŸ––
But we were told calling them β€œbitcoins” would be less confusing for the normies. This is what you get for being arrogant and not listening to your users. #SatsAreTheStandard ✨ GM β˜€οΈ PV πŸ€™ image
View quoted note →

Replies (79)

That is confusing and I don't know of a better way around it, but in the future most people will never own 1 full bitcoin so to me it makes sense in the long run and that to me is less confusing than trying to explain an unrelated term. Since Bitcoin has a lot of marketing power and brand recognition, it makes sense to utilize that since the masses aren't aware of the 'sats'.
I'm sure you're a nice guy, but who TF cares? Following your logic, they may not know what a sat is, but they MAY know the market value of one bitcoin if they're LiTeRaLly paying in bitcoin via Square. Having a coffee be 6,000 bitcoins is just DUMB. Either A. Use sats B. Use bitcoins Don't use A but call it B πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ
It takes work and time to understand sats . I love bitcoiners that know lightning and use "stack sats and stay humble" 🀌⚑️
i really think you're only saying that because it's the term you've heard since you've been in bitcoin. it's familiar to you. i like familiarity too, but when i think about other people, they've heard of the term bits before and because of the definition of the term, they know that they're small, or a part of something. sats is an unknown word and unrelated to bitcoin. at least bit is part of the word, so the association is clear.
How about ΞΌβ‚Ώ? 1ΞΌβ‚Ώ = 100 sats, which is already workable. I also know, that sats is a friction point. So I would only have one name + metric prefix, that many familiar with.
not everyone refers to 0.01 of X currency unit as a cent either by using the bitcoin symbol you are creating confusion by overlapping 2 definitions an unknown concept takes only 30 seconds to explain
imo the problem with that symbol is 1) i am too dumb to know how to say it or pronounce it and 2) i am also too dumb to figure out how to type it on a keyboard without googling it. now i am a dumbass from time to time, so i could be wrong here, but i think that symbol is even worse for the masses.
that would be possible if people had innate knowledge of everything that exists on this planet try explaining to someone that there are 2 conventions, one is bitcoin referring to whole coin, and one being a synonym for sats, with no good way to tell, and that this has no reason to exist
If I take my irl friends for example, most of them are nocoiners. They all understand what sats are. Only had to explain with this: there’s 100M sats in 1 bitty. They just got it right away. But to your point, I still don’t fully get why most don’t understand this.
There is also the fact that what is being done here is rewrite an existing term. Bits vs sats is preference, everyone knows 1 bit = 100 sats. But this change is redefining the symbol to mean 1/100Mth of what it was.
Sow let everybody do the work and learn @ the price they deserve. This is getting akward. Almost impossible to explain. Why mess with units when you have an oak point with a satoshi, and I say that as an intermediary?
Imagine the confounding poor’s rage when they try to rationalize the purchasing power discrepency between ten Bitcoin versus ten sats. They will certainly become enraged and angry at rich multicoiners. It’s setting people up for a new wealth divide and rubbing their faces in it. Not cool.
Default avatar
Hofer99 1 month ago
We are extremely early... wait 100 years and everyone will know what a sat is. 20 years ago we all had no fking clue what a btc is.
Guess what our biggest "brand" related recognition the one everything builds on and ever normie knows about is there are onl 21 MILLION BITCOIN. By calling sats bitcoin this gets completely thrown out of the window.
only people who don't use bitcoin as money care that 1 BTC = $104,598. want to buy something? the current exchange rate is 956 β‚Ώ/$. look how easy that is
All humans must be explained things at least once. No one is born knowing 100m sats = 1 btc . Thats not a flaw in the experience but a built in part of being human. Now if you had to explain the concept again a second time then that person is too mentally retarded to spend money or under the age of 3.
My one bitcoin used to be worth $100,000 but now they telling me it's actually worth $0.001 no cap. Jack a fuckin snack cause I get 100,000x more of them when i use cashapp. Fuckin rizz bro. Im only using cashapp bitcoins from now on cause i get way more of them. The bank delulu and printed more bitcoins for me. Imma yeet it all into robux before they find out. Haha they cooked! So this cheugy nerd told me there can only ever 21m bitcoin but im like nah u sus. Cant believe I gots 100k of em frfr. Check my drip coz Im in my $$$ era no cap. I ate up that investment shizz, pov bro be bussin. But must have heard him wrong because now theres 21 quadrillion bitcons which, bonus, is also a super easy number for me to picture in my head. Cant wait for the banks to open Tuesday so I can sell this shit and slay #blessed 6-7.
There a difference in explanation and education. You don't know how to read until someone tells you what letters are. Do we need to improve how we communicate with letters? Or is it pretty easy to explain some things. If we didn't have a dollar and they came out today, no one would know what dollars and cents are. In this case the "explanation is just defining terms. Same with Bitcoin. All you have to do is define terms. There no long winded explanation you need to give. Bits has to be explained the same way as sats do. Except literally no one in the ecosystem uses bits in their application EXCEPT for cash app.
Display currency: $ $1=100 USD USD 1USD = 1USD Yeah, not confusing at all. This is what newcomers need to understand how fractions work. /s
Bits is fine, btw. It still has 1 meaning (100 sats). Sats are better but this is not ambiguous compared to the shitty B that is ambiguous.
↑