Replies (14)

That's the thing, there is no "push" or "urgency" - those are false narratives. Note that Peter Todd made the exact same PR 2 years ago but it was closed due to lack of interest.
The surviving Bitcoin's network actively works to censor: Bitcoin censors ability to create any more than 21mm supply Bitcoin censors attempts to remove proof of work Bitcoin censors insertion of required counterparties (3rd parties) to use it Bitcoin censors attempts to undermine ultimate power by node operators Bitcoin censors attempts to remove difficulty adjustment Bitcoin censors ecosystem apathy via dramatizing agents of change (slain heroes) Bitcoin censors marches towards less security or more centralization Bitcoin censors changes to make economic transactions to be censored
Jameson Lopp's avatar Jameson Lopp
🎵No time for nuanced discussion🎵 🎵Must protect Bitcoin from destruction🎵 View quoted note →
View quoted note →
How so? Looking at running Knots myself too. The current debate is a healthy reminder of why an alternative to Core is important. Regardless of the op_return outcome.
zBTCowany's avatar
zBTCowany 8 months ago
It’s going to take a while, but you are going to end up just as Roger Ver, not the big block head (which you are btw) but a king spammer. People start pointing fingers at you and your shitty products. Once that label sticks and everyone sees you for what you are, things are going to get rough.
NEO's avatar
NEO 8 months ago
Only if you pay with Bitcoin….Spend Bitcoin to make more Bitcoin