Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 19
Generated: 19:26:47
Login to reply

Replies (19)

I think in general a drastic repositioning of the visual appearance of a brand can make a lot of sense from time to time, especially when the brand itself underwent significant change. The former icon maybe had scaling issues due to the color way. But I agree, the new icon is just basic bitch shit 😅
2025-05-22 07:21:01 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
This is 100% philosophical and 0% psychological reasoning, which, in my opinion, is wrong for design. Block isn’t a customer-facing company, but it’s still a company - a parent company - that communicates with current and potential employees, partners, and investors. It previously did that very well; it was inspiring, magical, and praised for its design and the sense of “this is where magic happens.” Now, it’s generic and dull, appearing like a mistake, as if no effort was invested. Even if the vision behind this direction was good, the execution isn’t. It looks beyond generic. The logo appears as a placeholder. Compared to Microsoft and the Windows logo - both even more minimal - the intention and story behind them are apparent. Here, they’re entirely absent. Clearly a mistake, in my view. Damn, I really loved the previous, dynamic logo.
2025-05-22 14:47:44 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
It's fine to rebrand, don't see why Block needed that, but fine. I see some scaling issues with the previous logo, but it could have been worked around with simpler versions for small sizes. The new one on the other side doesn't work at any scale; it needs to be supported by other elements, or else it falls apart; and still will look like a crap.
2025-05-22 14:56:00 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply