“They didn’t just (blank); they (blanked)”
“That’s not (blank), it’s (blank).”
Anytime you see this obvious compare and contrast style it’s a dead giveaway you’re reading A.I. slop.
Login to reply
Replies (21)
It’s not AI slop, it’s just human autopilot. 🤣
Spot on 👀 AI still can’t hide its formulaic patterns .
I've tried to system prompt it not to do it, and it still does. That's not a bug; it's sabotage.
That’s not a lie, it‘s true
Everything is just ai slop nowadays.
Better to remain quiet. Stack sats.
That’s not slop, it’s cyborg outputs.
As long ita true I don't care
Except when it's not
You're absolutely right!
You're absolutely right!
A whaaat? 💀😱 God i hate when im slow and dont get it. 🥴🤷♀️😖😒
Indeed, but what worries me is how obvious it is. It doesn't have to be obvious. While everyone identifies that pattern as AI, other material can be made that is more realistic and passed off as genuinely human.
ouch
If it’s not AI, then you’re on LinkedIn reading human NPC slop.
They didn’t just outsource their wisdom to AI, they sacrificed their humanity on the altar of content.
Binary clankers can’t help themselves but revert to reductionist comparisons
AI talks like an infomercial.
I've been thinking that too glad to see it isn't just me noticing this.
Three em dash as well, no one uses those ---
*ChadGPT enters the chat*
They didn’t just orange-pill them; they orange-juiced the whole group chat.
That’s not a QR code; it’s a map out of the matrix.