Replies (103)
🎯
There are many of them. I'm afraid the US wrote this playbook to change govts it didn't like in all sorts of places. Ukraine anyone...
👀 Incentive to drop Charlie, then scrawl bullshit on (2 too many) bullet casings now hits different. This should be everywhere.
View quoted note →He is definitely a paid agitator. Supposedly the most cancelled man in the world, while also being the most influential. Like saying war is peace lol
💯
LFG 🤙
Have you watched his show America First?
Jones and Schroyer, there were many right wingers there that day
🫡🫂
Done 🤙
🧡👊
🫡
Yeah 🤘
👊🧡
🫡🔥
✅💜
Right
✓ 🫡
👊
🫡
🤙🫂✨
Done ✅
🫂
Already 🤙
I did 🫂
🤡
❤️🔥👊
Whoever pays/protects him, is likely who set up Charlie Kirks assassination.
"Cui Bono"
🌻
done
Done, Sir
Hmm. Who do you think is paying him?
True ✅
If you or I did that we would be locked up no chance of parole & made an example out of to the public for inciting violence. We'd probably get life.
✨🤙
🫡
I hope that you kept the receipt for that bullshit that you bought. If you did, share them.
at a certain point you have to stop conspiratizing everything and deal with the ideas.
Then why is he not on any of the major podcasts that every other Fed gets invited to and the one he was invited to paywalled the show?
To maintain the illusion that he is not controlled. Imo
Wrong.
Why wasnt he charged? Give me a single rational explanation.
Deep state. That could be Israel, could by CIA, Soros who knows…
Exactly. “Who benefits”
Why some arrested? Some not?
AND
Obvious inciting from Fuentes and wasn’t charged? While Other people who just walked around spent 3 years in jail.
Doesn’t add up.
Just clips here or there when he’s dropping nbombs.
Who’s wrong? Me? 🤔
Yes. I’ve seen no evidence that he’s a paid agitator. And instead of debating whether or not he’s a fed, address some of his ideas.
What i buy? 🤔
—I just saw a clip of Nick Fuentes clearly inciting an insurrection in the same fashion that paid FBI informants were proved to be doing.
because he didn't go into the capital?
He was subpoenaed by the House Select Committee investigating Jan. 6.
In January 2022, the Committee issued subpoenas to Nick Fuentes (and Patrick Casey) over their promotion of election-fraud conspiracy theories, their role in planning pro-Trump rallies that preceded the Capitol attack, and large Bitcoin donations they received prior to Jan. 6. (Sources: VICE, Business Insider, Politico)
The subpoena asked whether the funds they got were tied to organizing or facilitating events related to Jan. 6. (Source: Business Insider)
He was on Capitol grounds that day.
Fuentes did not enter the Capitol building as far as public evidence indicates—he was present outside, on the grounds. (Sources: Wikipedia, Politico)
He celebrated the attack afterward.
For example, he tweeted: “The Capitol Siege was fucking awesome and I’m not going to pretend it wasn’t.” (Sources: Just Security, VICE)
He remains under investigation.
According to reports, Fuentes is under scrutiny by the FBI and/or DOJ regarding whether the Bitcoin donations he received were tied to illegal activities connected to Jan. 6 or its lead-up. (Source: Business Insider)
The Jan. 6 Committee has also described that his assets and he remain under investigation.
Don’t get me started on Jan 6! It was the event that red pilled me.
Grok:
1. How many January 6 defendants spent time in prison?
- ~700–750 people were sentenced to incarceration (prison or jail time). This includes those convicted of nonviolent entry (often short sentences, ~60 days) and violent offenses (up to 22 years).
2. How many were charged but did not enter restricted areas?
- ~150–400 defendants were charged but not specifically for entering the Capitol or restricted grounds.
- Total charged: ~1,570–1,583.
- Charged with entering restricted areas: ~1,186–1,417.
- Difference (~150–400) includes those charged for actions outside the Capitol (e.g., planning, incitement, or aiding without physical entry).
Notes: Data comes from DOJ records and reports (e.g., PBS, NPR). Most convictions (~99%) were via guilty pleas. All convictions were pardoned or commuted on January 20, 2025, except for 14 commuted sentences.
There where probably lots of people that entered and didn't get charged. Shotgun enforcement by on the ground officers. I don't think this has the implications your saying it does. What about nicks message do you find that glows?
Yeah but how many Patriot Front Members were there!!! Probably a few :)
"Break down the barriers and disregard the Police!!" <—❗️❗️❗️
There were people charged that weren’t even there that day.
Fishy
Grok:
1. How many January 6 defendants were charged but weren't physically at the event?
- Approximately 100–150 people were charged for involvement without being physically present at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. These cases typically involved remote actions like online planning, incitement, threats, or aiding/abetting from afar (e.g., conspiracy charges under 18 U.S.C. § 371 or threats against officials).
- Examples include individuals coordinating via social media or phone without traveling to D.C., such as some associates of extremist groups who helped organize but stayed home.
- Total charged: ~1,570–1,583. Most (~98–99%) were for on-site actions (e.g., ~1,417 for entering restricted areas or ~608 for assaulting officers). The remainder (100–150) fits remote roles, based on DOJ breakdowns and analyses excluding physical presence.
Notes: Data from U.S. Department of Justice updates, NPR's case database, and Wikipedia summaries of proceedings. All cases were pardoned or dismissed post-2025, but figures reflect pre-pardon status. Exact remote counts aren't officially tallied, but estimates derive from charge distributions (e.g., non-entry/non-assault felonies).
🤙🫂🧡
He was probably right, given what we know now. Our Congress is beyond corruption, both sides.
If he’s right or wrong isn’t my point.
I totally do agree with you.
It’s very strange that his participation was not punished.
Why is that?
If we don’t recognize how much of this is orchestrated from the govt itself, we’re lost and confused and unable to defend against it.
🧡👊🏻🍻
He’s gotten such a bad rap over the years which makes sense b/c of his America First stance + his clips are always taken out of context. So I had to listen to him -my opinion has completely changed.
His show is very informative and to be honest, I’ve learned a lot, especially about the Middle East (as a veteran, I appreciate his take). I don’t agree with all his talking points, but the young kid is bright and won’t be going away anytime soon.
Give his show a listen, not just the clips, and who knows, your opinion might change.
Government asset
Bingo.
It’s occurred to me that we have potentially dozens of factions working from within our govt that could be responsible for this nut job.
🧡👊🏻🍻
I just see clips of him dropping nig bombs.m lately and then this.
It’s not.
She’s retarded.
Typical woman, uses 1 million words when 100 will do.
Easy sign of low intelligence like that racist cunt DEI SCJ.
Glenn Greenwald did a short segment on Nick Fuentes recently and why he was so pissed that Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson had implied that he was an asset/controlled opposition (? I think I'm remembering that right).
I know almost nothing about him and did not realize that he was at J6. No repercussions for him for that, I guess?
This is very wrong… women really shouldn’t try to explain men’s motives.
Never thought I’d agree with you in anything, but here we are.
Awwwww… shucks…
The swamp is deep and wide.
Excellent point, and noticing.
Was there ever ANY video of the trials or from prison? Could have just been a bunch of paper nonsense. Wouldn’t be the first trial?
You ever been down Waco? The granddaddy of staged events since the Cold War
*wouldn’t be the first fake trial
Why do you use grok?
I’ll take a look at that. Thx!
I was unaware of Fuentes until recently.
I can't stand Nick Fuentes, I have no idea why people actually follow the little twerp.
Agitators often serve unseen masters.
I think the gist of it was that he (Fuentes) came out against Israel's influence over US politicians years ago when both Tucker and Candace were still very pro-Israel. He was de-banked, censored, etc, and none of the current America First folks lifted a finger to help. Now they've finally come around to that perspective and are accusing him of being an asset.
Its all So complicated. Its like there’s a power struggle on both side with Fuentes is like the far right racist pushing for civil war and horrifying to someone like me thats conservative but no problem with classical liberalism.
I listened to greenwald. Im open to the idea that the same force just opted not to go after Fuentes because he’s destructive to the right.
—or at least, an accelerant to civil war.
Spotify
Glenn Takes Your Questions on Tucker/Candace v. Nick Fuentes, the Unabomber Manifesto, Independent Media, and More
System Update with Glenn Greenwald · Episode
Didn’t he almost get clapped?
How so, what shifted for you?
I'm genuinely curious about peoples 'wake up' moments
A video called “Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutes” by someone named Wooz News. He vanished after it went viral, and it got largely scrubbed from the internet for a long time. I realized it was made by someone who works as an editor or assistant editor in the business, and his analysis was spot on.
Whoever the guy is they have playing him since his return is not the same guy.
Yea I think I saw that one. Basically everyone in the aftermath of the "shooting" is standing around acting like they're doing "medical looking things" cause they think its all for still photos and not video?
Yeah and the glass was fake. That detail did me in. There’s no possible explanation for fake glass in windows at the capitol if the event isn’t entirely theater.
Once I accepted that a fake riot and shooting could be staged at the capitol building, I realized they can fake absolutely anything and people will believe it.
yeah, more and more I view it all as a show
Fitting profile photo: all the world's a stage (for psyops)
Would really love your specifically on the Charlie Kirk episode. Brokered deal to retire from Israeli propaganda front and sidestep the genocide issue?
I had to burn my first nym when I fell down the rabbit hole and came to see the history for what it is
Me looking up what nym is
I think they really shot him but I don't trust any particular theory of who "they" is just yet
The whole "Vallhalla" thing is suggestive of him not being dead but I don't really trust the "revelation of the method" line of thinking either; I think there's no reason for them to drop that as a clue/confession
But yeah, many anomalies - George Zinn, Valhalla, discrepancies in the official trantifa narrative. I don't know what to make of it
Potentially. There are numerous foreign entities (likely along with the CIA and other such “institutions” in the country) who desire civil war in America or flinging America into a losing world war in Asia.
We are being led by traitors and if we don’t seize back control, we all be immiserated beyond our wildest imaginations…
He’s pissed because if people buy into that, that equates to zero credibility for anyone on the deep left or deep right.
Everyone on both extremes despises Feds (they’re not wrong).
Maybe, but why didn’t he agitate this week then? He gave a sermon on suffering for Christ & rejecting vengeance the next day. Seems like a blown opportunity if he’s being utilized in this way.
Stupid. Just talk to the people in question. No one mentioned is that extreme, and the number of the actual white supremacists (which barely existed in the 90s before the diversity obsession) is quite low (never mind the 1/2 that are Feds or assets themselves).
I smelled a rat immediately when with the first shot to hit the internet had an absolutely uncannily timed zoom in and then zoom out (?!). I detect a VFX blood gag with a very fast track (and what appears to be AI slop) in the close up video. Then all the footage of old men being detained being crystal clear but all footage of the death being highly compressed? It became too much to ignore.
Then his wife and best friend (Candace) have just NOT acted like he is actually dead, all kinds of examples of strange comments and tonally off, especially the wife. Big smiles all through her speech.
The “Charlie could no longer carry water for Israel” narrative Candace and others have been laying out makes me think he brokered some kind of deal with his big donors to step down/aside from public spotlight in spectacular fashion
That’s my working means/motive/opportunity
Of course that makes me sound insane but it’s genuinely what my mind finds most plausible.
If he was really dead and the wife is smiling like that, she had him killed. But the videos don’t show a man getting murdered at all, they show really advanced AI doctoring IMHO
Not that you asked for my take, and you shouldn’t be surprised, because I am Mr. Clownworld 😅
Yeah, I'm looking it at from a rationalist "what events have happened" perspective
You're much more sensitive to the fine details of presentation than I am
People think I’m a crazy person but I don’t know what the point of carefully studying how videos are made for the last 20 years is if I’m not willing to trust my own analysis of how a particular video was most likely made
