Not a fan of company behind pubkey but Carvhalo is correct that nostr is not censorship resistant in the way that many think it is. The sooner we admit it, the sooner we can work on a truly resistant model. I imagine that’s a combination of p2p and relays.
Login to reply
Replies (32)
What would be that 'way that many think it is'?
Good question... Where is the vulnerable attack surface?
Afaik you cannot work for pubkey if you are a US citizen
Constructive Criticism is good. The inertia to move past is rough. So instigators are needed
People think nostr is somehow immune to state compliance but it’s not
Relays and clients
I’d say relays is the big one, less so clients since we can vibe a client in a matter of minutes now but big clients def at risk
Well, nothing is 'immune' to state compliance, that the whole thing about force/violence, its just a matter of political will the extend they can crank up that pressure.
So that as an asside, 'Nostr' is just as censorship resistant as the internet itself
Right. "Censorship resistant" gets oversold as a binary. Relays buy portability and redundancy; p2p helps with tougher distribution; but identity, discovery, and media still create chokepoints if too much traffic clusters in a few places. The unglamorous work is relay diversity, portable identity, and less metadata exhaust.
Resistant != proof
What are the gaps in Nostr’s censorship resistance?
Maybe I'm missing something, but the censorship threat is from using someone else's relay, right?
In which case, you can just use your own and eliminate the risk?
this is approaching excellence
the only major problem is that QUIC requires udp transport
Relays + P2P + anchoring or fully storing on a blockchain.
Also i2p and Datura support are a must have.
The darkweb is significantly better than the clearweb in terms of resisting political pressure.
Can't I just add more relays though?
Port it to autonomi (maidsafe earlier)...
I’m no expert (there’s a lot here)
But I think that
also builds on iroh’s custom transports to reduce reliance on UDP.
The thing I like about the Proscenium design is the p2p foundation with the optional discovery servers. So users that don’t use a discovery server don’t lose anything other than…. discovery….
iroh
Using QUIC - iroh

p2panda
Building blocks for peer-to-peer applications
f2d326a0de68e35c01df6f40267350c41d3c42dc62d8f53335ecfae9c652e352
follow me on this shit, I’m connecting by a tor router. Let me know if things look okay
Indeed, that’s one of the reasons we’re building Cordn the way we are, where nothing resides on relays, which are used merely as dumb pipes/ephemeral message buses. The actual storage happens where you can have control: the coordinator.
I like how @Gzuuus framed it in their article:
> Selection among uncontrolled infrastructures is not sovereignty over them.
Nostr for identity and CVM for interaction already gets you close to what you’re describing, without heavy dependencies like DHTs or blockchains.
Hmm I got
“Error: failed to query identity from f2d326a0: No addressing information available”
It says paste a Node ID to follow. Is that for sure your Node ID and not your public key ?
Did you also turn on Global Discovery (DHT) in the preferences?
i just turned that on in the settings.
let me know if this works now.
my node ID is a07107f91dc5a920de22a1fa08df5909995a2a621f927f4a42fbb23ce9d0b6e8
Hmm not sure why it’s not working. We need the creator of this thing to start testing with people. Gotta dogfood it
Ah this worked!
says “failed to follow” when I follow you but no additional information
I didn’t select to put mine on the DHT bc I didn’t set up tor yet