SDNY just responded to Samourai Wallet disclosure of withheld evidence: "There is no basis for a hearing, nor is there anything to remedy." Insanity. image

Replies (25)

.'s avatar
. 11 months ago
This is no longer just a shit case This is a State sponsored hit
L0la L33tz's avatar L0la L33tz
SDNY just responded to Samourai Wallet disclosure of withheld evidence: "There is no basis for a hearing, nor is there anything to remedy." Insanity. image
View quoted note →
Abolish the monopoly on the courts (and abolish the legislature for that matter)!!
L0la L33tz's avatar L0la L33tz
SDNY just responded to Samourai Wallet disclosure of withheld evidence: "There is no basis for a hearing, nor is there anything to remedy." Insanity. image
View quoted note →
.'s avatar
. 11 months ago
The disclosure was not willful nor within the 2 week Brady rule the judge set in his courtroom.
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 11 months ago
(related note) nevent1qqszhg845lllk8zmgxpjgnfutt8ljfzhwtjy5knh0psv45wy9tvnf3sprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdaksh7qe36
Default avatar
Rand 11 months ago
bluff/stall tactic
So basically, FinCEN telling SDNY that Samourai Wallet *did not* need a MSB license was just their "individual, informal opinion," bro. (full story at end of post) According to SDNY, such "individual, informal opinions" are not Brady material, and therefore SDNY has not withheld anything, mooting the defense's request for a hearing. To the contrary, SDNY argues, that the prosecutors even handed such "individual, informal opinions" over – despite not believing that they are Brady material – "demonstrate its complete commitment to meeting its disclosure obligations." The problem is that they may have a point citing SCOTUS overturning of the Chevron doctrine, meaning that courts are no longer required to defer to an agency's interpretation of the law. On the other hand, when not even regulators are able to interpret the law correctly according to SDNY, it should be questionable how anyone else would be supposed to. Full story: nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpk9xancv89h24rme53yhl6dh0hyhwce528eu5hrrfcsgvkg3vermqyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qqs8mjm67xamkhnkqvrx8vvkjrxqmrnjwldzryfkkvsncdtz6ulrlfq2s9pp9
If they dismiss now is it with prejudice? I actually want this to set precedence, not just be a one off win.
jon doe's avatar
jon doe 11 months ago
L0la L33tz's avatar L0la L33tz
SDNY just responded to Samourai Wallet disclosure of withheld evidence: "There is no basis for a hearing, nor is there anything to remedy." Insanity. image
View quoted note →
Not that insane. Prosecution can't admit they have shit all over their faces. Wait and see what the judge says, then raise alarms if necessary.
agreed. they have to take this stance, otherwise its an admission that they withheld evidence. no cause for alarm (yet). wait for judge's ruling.
Default avatar
Rand 11 months ago
^/thIZ IZ just cuz i like music & i t*Y* 4 your notes @L0la have a gr*\/\/aywknd/*****