I always liked Damus and thought it was great that there was an alternative client to primal, but today I'm deleting Damus off my phone and removing any relays operated by JB.
I don't care about anyone's petty posting fights, but i will not be using any technology operated by someone who will "happily doxx" people. I suggest you do the same.
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (47)
hmm idk, only just catching up on this but it sounds like the guy doxxed himself, no?
if you are receiving spurious legal threats from somebody who claims to want to be anonymous but also tells you their name to legitimise the threat, I’m struggling to follow how you can “doxx” them?
He also created zaps
Such a drama; the only sensible thing is to not partake. Being on nostr and asking the relay operators to censor is a weird flex, to say the least.
Allen No . This is not ok!!!
Is it doing if you are not even trying to hide a bit your real ID under a pseudo ?
Exposing bad behaviour and name shaming is not doxxing IMO
I'm sure everyone will make an exception for that.
Is it doxxing*
You're happy with legal threats against Nostr builders tho?
This comment wins.
Personally I'd publish any legal threat. I wouldn't publish a friendly but misguided request. The letter was formulated as a legal threat, implying legal threats could follow, but was actually just a misguided request. It makes both sides of the argument understandable.
is publishing someones legal name on the internet doxxing? lmfao, wow
Wow what about of whataboutist nonsense. In no scenario whatsoever did he need to post this guys clear name on the internet
So anyone who knows my legal name is free to post it on the internet and that wouldnt be doxxing bc i told them my name? Yea that makes a lot of sense.
I get that the idea here was to scould the person for sending "a threat," but that could have easily been done by redacting his clear name and just letting his npub / handle be public. Literally zero point in doxxing the guy besides being an asshole.
the context is much more specific than “you told them”. it’s “you told them because you had to tell them to exercise your threat of violence”. it feels like much more of a grey area than you are making out.
I’m not clear it’s okay either but I’d like you to explain why?
says who? a mentally disturbed alcoholic woman with 4 cats? stfu clown 🤡
fake threats made up lawyers are totally fine right? 🤡😂
gibberish
drink less wine 🍷 touch grass lolita
First of all, all you wannabe libertarian snowflakes need to make up your minds whether words are violence or not. If someone insulting you on social media isn't, then getting sent an email isn't either.
Second, and I find it very concerning that this seems to be news to you, *publicly posting someones name on the internet* that *wasn't known before* – esp someone who *is public about his interests in bitcoin* – puts this person at serious risk of *actual violence* –> e.g. someone coming to your house and cutting your fingers off or kidnapping your family.
Honestly appalling to even attempt to be making a comparison here between sending someone *an email* and putting that person's life in *actual danger* and then going on to call that "a grey area."
Then dont email him your name and threaten him, retard
Always the worst takes from you
Real world 😂 Bullshit. Mutual trust and respect. At least I know what and who I won't invest in anymore and will never do business with!! Basic responsibility when you run a business don't doxx people!
The someone in question doxxed himself willingly in order to threat other people from State violence. And FYI he was asking Will and other big relays operators to assiste in the doxxing of someone else eventually...
You should be punished if you threaten someone of violence / State violence which is the same eventually. And being named and shamed is the best way to treat immoral behaviors IMO.
I'm sorry for TheGrinder if he is harassed but he could have stay undoxxed and just blocked and reported the harassing npub.
Love your work but be a bit less pedantic and humble sometimes it will do you good.
So anyone who knows your legal name "that you threaten in order to make them help you doxx someone else" is free to post it on the internet ? I mean why not. Play stupid games get stupid reward.
Basic responsibility when you want anonymity is not to email people your real name 🤦♂️
You wannabe ignorant statist defending other statists doxxers should accept that threats are not words like any other.
Seriously you are out of your mind girl, accept that it's not all black and white in that case and stop climbing on your supposed higher principles.
When you are an asshole you should sometimes expect being treated as such right ?
**AN** alternative to Primal?! lol
You know Will can your IP right?
Yes, I understand how relays work 🤣
basic responsibility when you don't want to be gossiped about is not to tell someone your secrets.
or, you know, don't be an asshole and don't share with the world what was meant to be between two people.
Yeah Lola never dissapoints with the ignorant or biased statements, as is customary with modern journalism. On topic, I think both guys are in the wrong with what they did. One doesn't understand the point of nostr, one could have left the doxx part out and just shown the npub's actions rather than the identity behind it.
Hahaha okay just making sure we are all on the same page about doxxing
If you dont want your IP known, use a vpn or tor (although flawed solutions)
Dont want your name known, dont include it in a mass email legal threat to devs 🤷♂️
VPN exit points ;)
ok, since your IQ is a bit low: two people: the one who wrote the email, the one who doxxed him.
do you get it now or do you need even more simplified?

reading comprehension a bit low, huh?
and of those, how many doxxed his details to nostr?
oh, was it one? so one doxxed, one sent email?
1+1=2?
two people, what I had just said?
I will email who i want you fucking loser lmfao
Damus isnt going to die if she stops using it. All these so called privacy advocates were silent when calle doxxed me. Its all virtue signaling.
absolutely no reason to be this hostile. I asked you a question about how *you think* about the issue because I am curious. “I don’t think there is nuance because xyz” is a reasonable response, whereas “FUCK YOU, YOU FUCK, NO FUCKING NUANCE” isn’t the intellectual pwnage you seem to think.
if you want to keep discussing, go ahead, I’ll ignore this comment. if you don’t want to discuss at all then just don’t.
especially pedos right?
calm down miss bond is not that serious
she is drunk 24/7 @npub1mznw...6mak its well known #introductions
ignore single woman with 4 cats sipping on red wine all day View quoted note →
You did not ask me a question. You defended a person getting doxxed. If you are going to frame critique on your position as a FUCK YOU then I'm not sure what you want to have a discussion for.
you have no idea what my position is. as it happens, I agree with you, but the hysterical shrieking and insults are making this exchange more annoying than it’s worth.
i didn’t realize @npub1mznw...6mak was this low iq. Easy unfollow