Replies (47)

tanel's avatar
tanel 1 year ago
shoutout to your video editor hella clean
wildcatfish's avatar
wildcatfish 1 year ago
I prefer fully diluted mNAV when share count/price is arbitrary.
Feelancer21's avatar
Feelancer21 1 year ago
bitcoin per share is so 2023. Use hashes per share. Few
Nah, mining is dead unless you are a nation state or you source your energy at 0.01$ or less per kwh
Bitcoin per share means you’re going to have to produce something of value. BPS is an idea, it’s not the tangible thing of value by itself, right? Like… let’s start a company and the business plan is “we will make profit.”
supermass's avatar
supermass 1 year ago
jack i would say there is a nonzero concern that “we intend to build on bitcoin” is a bit of a nonstarter unless you are coming with concrete plans. any info as to what those are at this time?
I do note that you said capital markets. There are different demands in for different markets. We have to start slaying our heroes, though, when the lingo is just cover for fiat gains. Is 21 going to provide proof of reserves right out of the gate?
I hope you storm the place and shake everyone up, Jack. But you know the track record here. Michael Saylor can't bring himself to call bitcoin money. That's just one example. Once people start using analogies, it turns into a fiat shitshow.
do you plan to differentiate yourself by providing the public markets with your public addresses so the world can view in realtime your holdings? that would be very based of you all. 🤝
STACKING SATS AND HODLING ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH FOR JACK "I LOVE PAYING TAXES" MALLERS EH? PLAY FIAT GAMES...
Would love to buy random shares for gamble, but why the hell I need to live in Europe 🤣🤣🤣 Cant find normal broker where I could buy Cantor Equity Partners Inc.
With 267 million shares outstanding and Jack’s example of 0.05 BTC per share, doesn’t it mean they’d need to hold 13.3 million BTC? Maybe I misunderstand or maybe it was just an unreal example for fun. nevent1qqsghxss0mntcj96ga2a3nsjznnfm30tatlc2h680mw04re8ccfgphqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet55sq8yp
You’re way overthinking it. BPS is a KPI that tells you if the company is creating value in bitcoin terms
He does, he just doesn’t call it currency. Him calling it currency or not doesn’t change anything about how bitcoin van be used. The most bang for the buck is going after SoV. Anyone that wants to larp about owning a company that pushes the bitcoin currency narrative can own Block and have subpar results
Overthinking is usually not the problem. I’ll take it over the alternative 😄 The question remains, where is that created value coming from?
Whether XXI produces anything of value does not change the fact that using bitcoin focused KPIs is the future.
I ha e been listening to him for a long time and have never heard him describe bitcoin as money. It's always digital real estate and digital capital. If you can point me to even one instance where he uses the word money to describe bitcoin, I'll gladly retract my statement.
Sorry not buying your stonk so your Jewish boss can stack more bitcoin. These Wall Street stonk salesmen scammers are flooding the market just like shitcoiners did.