UNPOPULAR OPINION: -
Bitcoin was already changed fundamentally (before blowing out op_return limit) when shitcoin core devs CHANGED THE DOCUMENTATION to RATIONALIZE inscription bug instead of FIXING it.
They officially signalled everyone at that point that bitcoin is not just for money but for (INEFFICIENT) DATA STORAGE as well.
Login to reply
Replies (16)
True. Iโm starting to think this was all intentional ever since SegWit. Taproot was a complete Trojan horse and we all welcomed it.
The README was also changed to have a more neutral stance instead of mentioning currency/money (cannot find links now, git commits will have the changes stored though)
No, Satoshi Nakamoto included OP_RETURN in the original Bitcoin spec and used it for (inefficient) data storage. Stop lying.
๐ฏ true
But you're doing the same thing. Shitcoin core devs want to pretend they speak for Satoshi while changing/ignoring his writing, you do too right?
Wrong. I don't pretend anything. OP_RETURN was introduced in 2014.
The OP_RETURN Limit Removal: Gaslighting or Technical Necessity?
Oh shit, I may have been severely misinformed. Thanks for your patience.
I was 100% wrong here
The amount makes the difference
The amount of data size
U better wake up and realize that its an attack
Dont be naive
Satoshi put his message inside the coinbase transaction of the Genesis Block (Block 0).
This note gives good explaination about Satoshi who has been always against spam.
Small data of up to 40 Bytes first and then 80 Bytes were not considered spam but shitcoin Core increased OP_RETURN from 80 to 100 000 Bytes. They fucked uo.
Feel free to kill yourself if you can't handle reality

