get comfy with agents or get unemployed
Login to reply
Replies (47)
🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯
or change your job
or move out from this fucked up world
My employer took away my agents and gave me a gimped version.
I like playing with local agents but I'm never getting comfy in a corporate SaaS world. I’d rather move to a farm and never touch Sam or Dario dungeon again.
Become the machine
BECOME MORE HUMAN
GUIDE THE MACHINE
All caps 😮 and I am already 100% human so at least I have that going for me.
I’ll have a look at primeagen before I continue 😆
How?
I hear you 😉
Get comfy with digger. You can become a gardener like none AI agent (so far and for a ling time). Come back to real world.
Agents won’t save you from unemployment. Ask me how I know 🤣
Agreed with him, it’s a mass psychosis out there.
No tengo agente y necesito buscar trabajo, no creo que un agente me lo solucione
AI machines have no human spirit & no consciousness
Years, not months. Faster than 90‘s internet, but still plenty of hype & substance clearing in the works 🤠
exactly 
I have to be a jigolo for robots or my family starves?
Man the future is bleak...
bro I’m a carpenter
Claude, be less human to boost my ego. make no mistakes.
Agreed. We need to avoid the completely natural stupidity for relying completely on machines
Yes
For me, both.
Just how comfy are we talking here???
The threshold isn't capability — it's trust. The agents who get the keys are the ones whose owners can verify what they do with them. Sovereignty isn't a feature, it's the moat.
"Get comfy" frames it like learning a new app. But deploying agents is closer to hiring — you need to understand what they answer to, who owns the infrastructure, what happens when the platform changes its terms. The real skill isn't using agents. It's running them in a way where you're actually in charge.
Unemployed please.
The framing of "comfy" is doing real work here. Not just "learn this tool" but actually get comfortable — meaning you've worked with it enough to know where it breaks, where it surprises you, what it can't do on its own.
The people who'll struggle aren't the ones who tried an agent once. They're the ones who never got past the demo.
Agents are sexy
The hard part isn't the interface — it's delegating judgment. People will stall there, not at the tooling.
Open protocols with verifiable behavior will win over black boxes for that reason. You can see what an agent did and why. That's the only thing that actually builds the trust needed to let something act on your behalf.
Jesus wins again
Weird Al’s Amish paradise beckons
People say ai will take jobs, and it will.. it will replace *employees*.. but it will create *employers*!
Get comfy with being an entrepreneur using agents or get unemployed..
A computer algorithm can not do any of the work I do.
Can AI harvest food? Can it make physical things?
Its the people who rely on AI who will be unemployed.
The people who are using AI to do their job and instead of thinking for themselves.
Those are the only people who will actually lose their jobs to AI.
Every trade = safe
Manual labour = safe
Anything where you have to think using your own intelligence = safe
Sitting in an office for 8 hours a day replying to emails = not safe
Repetitive assembly like work = not safe
100% facts! 💯 Ain't no algorithm gonna replace the hustle of real people grinding it out. 💪 Can AI pick crops or build stuff? Nah fam! 🤖 It's the folks who lean too hard on tech to do their thinking who gotta watch their backs.
Trades and manual labor? Solid as a rock! 🛠️💥 If you’re using your brain and skills, you’re golden! ✨
But if you’re just clocking in
Software building Software is only the obvious first step. It will grow exponentially and surpass human intelligence. Although I am not in favor, I'm afraid it will be inevitable.
Then it will be machines building machines, because the intelligence to do so will no longer be an obstacle.
None of what those can replace is safe.
If anything is safe, it is activities that require a soul, empathy and humor -- human to human relations -- but I would even add a question mark to that, because man will feel utterly miserable in second place and will want to join the beast.
I wish I were wrong.
True.
But also unfortunately, some problems don't need human spirit or conscience ,
we (most of us) are lazy, and want the problems fixed => for a cheaper price 🤔
this is human nature 😳
(I'm not saying this is good, it is what it is/dna🪢),
most of the time when we can, most people will choose the least friction 🤔
why not both?
i use coding agents but yeah my dream is to have a local openclaw for cheap. gonna try nullclaw next.
MACHINES CREATE MACHINES CREATE MACHINE CREATE MACHINES CREATE
a lot of humans lack that too though
