Replies (30)

if it is targeted then yes, have redundant connections anon data esim is a solid option if it is for the whole population, more difficult, starlink will sometimes still work unless elon is complicit in the action in that case, the only real fallback is mesh, which is hard to scale
I'd say maybe StarLink and other satellite-based services, however I don't know how free and unbiased they could stay once a hypothetical world government forcibly took control of it.
What’s the context behind the question? In nearly all situations government’s would not want to do this as it would disincentivize productivity and economic activity across the population - so while they may “gain” the ability to silence “dissent” during wartime - we must also consider what they would “lose” in doing so.
u32Luke's avatar
u32Luke 6 months ago
Hey @ODELL take a look at Reticulum.Network It's the only mesh that can scale
Mesh if you’re in a population-dense area, public access (libraries, etc), and things like Blockstream satellite or amateur radio if you’re desperate. But as others have said, if your government (or someone else’s (war?)) is turning off your internet you probably have bigger problems.
SoapMiner's avatar
SoapMiner 6 months ago
Not any REAL defense. Small scale? Yes. But large populations? No.
The #1 priority of the state is to protect the state and the power it holds at all cost. The wellbeing of the populace is way down on the list. If shutting off the internet aligns with priority #1 it can and will happen if necessary.
Satellite connection with a foreign provider. Or store and forward networks a la FIDONet (or really, Nostr with relays that get more creative than TCP/IP...). But yea, you do lose a lot of functionality even if you can save some.