Motherfuckers be talking "rules without rulers" and "global decentralized consensus" and still want their favorite team to fly to the other side of the world and kill people who are different from them do better.

Replies (22)

Ragamuffin's avatar
Ragamuffin 6 months ago
Isn't it wild? People actively advocating for the death of innocents. Just because a theoretical bad guy government *might* build a nuke. What a derranged mentality. The best part is this is all based on information provided by entities that have historically gone out of their way to lie about facts to further their agenda. War is evil. Anyone advocating for expiditionary warfare has lost all touch with reality. It is morally bankrupt to claim "self defence" while initiating attacks based on what the other guy *might* do. Mindless puppets parrot what their masters say. They should not be argued with, they cannot be convinced of their evil, they are lost. I pray those taut stringed fools find their redemption before its too late.
You're the same guy that accused me of being mentally ill because I don't trust "anyone or anything" when I'm an American who's been saying for years the US should be the first to denuclearize, as we're the ones that invented nukes And you keep implying it's OK to bomb Iran because they could get a nuke someday
Iran: Hangs gay people, stones women, executes protesters, enriches uranium while chanting ‘Death to America’, funds Hamas/Hezbollah terror attacks, targets Western ships, orchestrates embassy bombings. Midwits who hate governments more than they hate theocratic murderous regimes: ‘Theoretical bad guy *might* do something!’
strawmanning a generational conflict in 50 words isn't particularly convincing.
Hanshan's avatar Hanshan
"The world is a harsh place and I'd rather my group do the genocide than be the one that's being genocided" is an opinion people can have. At scale that opinion ensures ceaseless warfare and death. It isn't pragmatism, it's the black pill.
View quoted note →
‘Strawmanning’ says the person who reduced this to ‘want their favorite team to fly to the other side of the world and kill people who are different from them’ - completely omitting the context of a murderous theocratic regime enriching uranium, funding Western terror attacks, and chanting ‘Death to America’ in parliament. Honk honk 🤡
Oh. That’s a very convincing counter argument to my simple question. It’s nice to see you can engage in an intellectual conversation and not move to childish insults that make you feel more like a man 👍