Replies (4)

You don't want to rare anywhere. Zaps, replies and shares are enough. They are universal things you can do on any content type. They are high signal and users do them anyway fir other reasons. LLM's and other types of computation can pick it up from there and show you whatever kind of synopsis stuffed to the aircofuck content type / user preference. If you prefer your synopsis to have some kind of ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ rating, go for it. But I'm not entering those.
Not writing ratings yet, we were just talking about it. @Niel Liesmons is totally against them. I'm not, I think it's a short way of expressing an otherwise written opinion (plus its low friction). I would use NIP-32 (on a NIP-94 file metadata) for rating a release. I don't think it's equivalent to rating a whole repository. First because it's fine grained (release) and because it's the actual product the user is using. The repo is way more general and upstream.