The cool thing about OpenSats is that a peer group of YOUR category reviews your application. YOUR PEERS review even before the board does. There is no room for evil NVK to decided your fate alone. 🫂

Replies (14)

JackTheMimic's avatar
JackTheMimic 2 months ago
Wouldn't that only matter if the community at large were more stringent than the board members. Peers generally want nearly all FOSS to succeed.
So you want everyone to believe that a group of peers rejected 3 times the lead seedsigner developer without you getting involved? ... suure! And the seedsigner domain squatting and your bad faith against the project is just a coincidence.
Absolutely not perfect, we will get it wrong many times. But ppl should consider other sources if it's not working out with OpenSats
They're not peers if you don't know who they are or even get a review of your application. Outside looking in, just ghosted pretty much. I'd even sign an NDA just to get some damn feedback .. But no, we just gotta start our own 501 or whatever if there is ever a suggestion.. 😅 ah well.
Unfortunate as seed signer is such a great product. I honestly don't even think they compete with cold card.
JD's avatar
JD 2 months ago
Why? Consider that we already have adequate tools for a revolution... But no revolution. Adoption is at plateau pain points. Bitcoin sorely needs education, proper representation (don't get started) and advocacy in legacy institutions as well as outside of them. IE: schools. Grants for proven educators to orange pill, speak, travel to teacher seminars full time would be a HUGE paying investment IMO. Inside legacy systems and out too. But anyhow. Open Sats, 27 arrows and Papa Saylor and anyone else can do whatever the hell they want with thier sats. But education is a massive, massive hurdle here.
jb55's avatar
jb55 _@jb55.com 2 months ago
I know who they were. They were all people who joined the craze and started building competing clients. My “peers” lmao.