Dan's avatar
Dan dan@nostrpurple.com 2 years ago
Running core with MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY=73 instead of the default 83. Am I censoring? Running core with MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY=63 instead of the default 83. Am I censoring? Running core with MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY=53 instead of the default 83. Am I censoring? When do I become a censor?

Replies (23)

Dan's avatar
Dan dan@nostrpurple.com 2 years ago
We must fight centralization by... *Checks notebook* ensuring nobody changes their node policies through social coercion and ostracization. Node policy diversity is centralization! War is peace!
1 replies ↓
rieger_san's avatar
rieger_san 2 years ago
The problem is that some individuals are trying to push a specific node policy in the „it’s a bug“ or „it’s a vulnerability“ corner, which is bullshit. Everyone should be able to set policies the way they want.
1 replies ↓
rieger_san's avatar
rieger_san 2 years ago
When I see all the „inscriptions are spam“ people who support luke and his CVE I could freak out 😑
1 replies ↓
Dan's avatar
Dan dan@nostrpurple.com 2 years ago
Being angry about the CVE specifically is a more nuanced outrage that 98% of what I am seeing on the Nostr. I can see the argument there. Don't agree still, but I see the argument.
1 replies ↓
Luke Dashjr's avatar
Luke Dashjr luke_nostr@dashjr.org 2 years ago
The CVE is for the vulnerability enabling Inscriptions to bypass node policy (regardless of what it's set to). There should be no reason to be angry. It's just the normal procedure for security issues
1 replies ↓
rieger_san's avatar
rieger_san 2 years ago
It‘s not a vulnerability nor a security issue! It’s just a use case you don’t like. That’s all, don’t pretend otherwise! Don’t get me wrong, I also think that inscriptions are useless, but the difference is that I don’t tell people how to use bitcoin.
3 replies ↓
rieger_san's avatar
rieger_san 2 years ago
I can read and I can code. That’s why I can say without doubts that inscriptions is not a vulnerability.
1 replies ↓
Default avatar
npub1jfu9...lx8n 2 years ago
$boost You just don't know what you're talking about. Allowing anyone to insert that much malicious code is a vulnerability. Whether jpegs or something more malicious. In his heyday John McAfee would have a ball with this. Exposing privacy and damaging security lol. You don't have a clue what the shadowy "supercoders" can do. And we absolutely do have a say, and an obligation as to what people do with Bitcoin. Not your keys, not your Bitcoin. Not your protocol, not your Bitcoin..😐
2 replies ↓
rieger_san's avatar
rieger_san 2 years ago
😂😂😂 It's funny that you think you can tell me what I have to think or how I have to use Bitcoin. What a fucking hubris!
↑