Currently reading "26 Words that Changed the Internet" which is about the legal battles in the 1990s over liability for publishing defamatory/obscene/illegal content that led to the words of Section 230: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." It's fascinating to see the parallels from 30 years ago to the Bitcoin Puritan movement of today. Hilariously enough, one of the common arguments by conservatives in the 1990s was that if we allowed the internet to be flooded with pornographic content, it would kill adoption and people would stop using the internet. ๐Ÿ˜… It's generally agreed that Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 is what allowed the internet as we know it to flourish by protecting freedom of speech in cyberspace. I dare say that these 26 words are also what protect node runners in America from having to worry about legal liability from distributing obscene content. In short, if you're a content distributor you are not liable for distributing obscene content if you are unaware of it. And distributors are NOT expected to police or moderate the information that flows through their service as a result of user interaction.

Replies (19)

FreeYoda's avatar
FreeYoda 2 weeks ago
"one of the common arguments by conservatives in the 1990s was that if we allowed the internet to be flooded with pornographic content, it would kill adoption and people would stop using the internet." There are 2 possible reasons for such behavior. 1) they want to force their ideas of what is correct on others, and if that would be related to how they are treated is one thing, but if it is related to what others can see or say is just plain censor. 2) they have problems with their own rules and are afraid that just the temptation of something available is too much for them to stick to their own rules..... Of course BOTH is also possible...
Ava Tharr's avatar
Ava Tharr 2 weeks ago
I considered starting a porn site in 1994, but didn't proceed because my wife would divorce me, and I had two young kids๐Ÿคฃ
Default avatar
satoshi jr 2 weeks ago
Maybe in the us the government might give 230 protection. What about the rest of the world? Why assume they will converge to american law?
Default avatar
satoshi jr 2 weeks ago
So ai slop but it seems 230 has exceptions for criminal, intellectual property, sex trafficking and privacy laws. If the threats csam 230 doesn't seem to protect nodes at all
Another manipulation of this bad actor and shitcoiner Jameson SLopp. Recently he said in an interview that email spam was not mitigated on protocol level and that let to centralization. BIP 110 reduces big data spam abuse on protocol level. so there it is but he won't admit it because he is evil shitcoiner.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
Core is completely compromised and corrupted. You are facilitator of Citrea's shitcoin on top of Bitcoin. Core V30 is malware that attacks Bitcoin Freedom Money. View quoted note โ†’ View quoted note โ†’ View article โ†’ View quoted note โ†’
View quoted note →
Default avatar
satoshi jr 2 weeks ago
Can you try to explain what you mean ? Eli5
โ†‘