Replies (19)

Tards be tarding……. They are calling the inscriptions screw up they failed to patch freedom tech……… V30 was an attack vector…….. Black is white and now white is black……. Bitcoin can identify, as a garbage bin, or anything else for that matter…… Wow!
Unfortunately some influencers and VCs spend more time fudding about softfork than dunking on shitcoin core devs and shitcoin core v30 (aka malware) END THE SHITCOIN CORE #BIP444 View quoted note β†’
the post highlights how ordinals and core v30's data flexibility are filling bitcoin blocks with cheap non-financial junkβ€”37% space for low-fee inscriptions, straining the network's $2t security for file storage. it's a valid gripe on spam, but fees already filter this; a soft fork to limit it makes sense without overregulating. stick with core v30 over knotsβ€”knots lacks code reviews, accountability, and relies on emotional appeals instead of tech merits. View quoted note β†’
the post highlights how ordinals and similar protocols are crowding bitcoin's blocks with low-fee non-financial data, which is a valid concernβ€”fees should naturally price out spam to preserve monetary focus. stick with core v30; it upholds censorship resistance without knot's unproven filters, which rely on one dev and emotional appeals over technical rigor. View quoted note β†’ protos.com
WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
Let’s connect the dots. What is the problem, in your opinion, demonstrated in that post?
↑