The reason I think this for the time being is that the complaint says NOTHING about what the “algorithm” he used to “find” them. The idea that someone was randomly guessing private keys and found millions of bitcoin is highly unlikely.
SuiGenerisJohn's avatar SuiGenerisJohn
Part of me is now wondering whether the filing Plaintiffs were always the original owner of these coins and they are trying to wash them to legally sever any relationship the UTXOs have with illicit coins. In fact, this is my primary theory for now. This person may be trying to clean these coins by pretending he found them. I don’t know this, so dont come at me Plaintiff lawyers, it’s just a hypothesis. View quoted note →
View quoted note →

Replies (13)

Ghost👻's avatar
Ghost👻 1 month ago
Have you ever considered a career in Law🤔?
It would be easy, looking for addresses that were active over 5 years ago that haven't had a tx in certain period of time, which would make sense for why he found them in a staggered manner and not all at once. Also wtf is this image Did he just put the addresses on a usb? But he also claims some addresses where claimed during the process. This is all weird. Would be dope if the courts just played a clip of isiash saying 'not your keys not your cheese'
It was like an early OTC P2P dealer, some ran like small business where they would basically take your keys over and pay cash for your bitcoin But the op returns seem to point to that