nobody has ever lied about how many decoys are present in ring signatures. it was announced over and over again. quit being a twat. >noo you can't just increase the anon set! hardforks are le bad again, nobody says you can't flood the network with valid transactions. go ahead and do it.

You're being marketed ring size of 16, but in reality you're getting 4-5. This is why you guys are changing it again, bc you got it wrong last time. As for the spam, it's a real issue & that is why they want to change the fee structure again, bc you got it wrong last time. You have no idea how many daily txs are spam aiming at that ring size of 4. You only have ~25k daily transactions, that's an easy target unless the fee structure is addressed.

Rings won't expand because they won't exist. They're being replaced with cryptographic accumulators. And you can't deanon those with spam. But I'm guessing you'll have an issue that it addressed your criticism with a hardfork. Damned if we do or don't.

Youre literally admitting here that your chain is currently not in working order. Lol.