Actual communists want there to be a state that determines what is morally right, in the economic realm, and forces everyone to do that.
Actual anarchists want there to be no state, but also don't want some chick on the internet to discuss the morality of usurious or nearly-usurious practices because that puts emotional/social pressure on them to not be a gigantic asshole.
Neither side wants to hear about the Bible. ๐คฃ
Login to reply
Replies (4)
anarchists who are atheists are just libertines and just want to have their jollies and then die, none of this horrible learning and pain stuff pls
Like, think through this logic.
Anarchistic atheist: I don't believe in religion. Religious morality is just made up hocus-pocus.
Me: Okay, I believe in it.
AA: That's because you are functionally retarded or brainwashed.
Me: Okay, fine. I think what you're doing with your business is probably immoral, according to my religion.
AA: I feel unsafe. The religious people are after me!
Me: I only said one sentence ๐คทโโ๏ธ , and you just said you didn't believe in divine or spiritual punishment or morality, anyway.
AA: Yes, but you said that you did and other people do and they might listen to you and then they will also think I'm doing something immoral and they will like me less and maybe avoid doing business with me.
Me: Cry harder.
AA: OMG LITERAL COMMUNISM.
๐
I'm exceptions to most of these
You think there isn't learning and pain on the path that atheists walk? When you don't have a magic book and magic friend to turn to, your entire life is first-hand discovery, exploration, trial and error, learning, meditating, seeking truth, re-seeking truth.
Marcus Aurelius may have been questionably spiritual, but he's close enough to an atheist to make the point better than I could.
To brashly and stupidly equate atheism solely with hedonism is pretty sophomoric and tired at this point in human history man.