People with titles like "Libertarian Socialism" and similar things keep appearing on my profile. These people have no idea about reality, I understand.

There are also a lot of bots.

They think that voluntary market exchanges is fascism 🙉

That's because of the political compass test, it gives libertarian socialism as one of the results even though it makes absolutely no sense 😂

Josef Stalin's parties in his palaces were pretty libertarian, inspiring works like "The Master and Marguerite". Maybe they think that's what they'll be doing under such a regime.

Socialism supports the idea of voluntary exchange. Socialism is not regulating the market, it's about removing the parasite class that gets their wealth from exploiting workers.

Libertarian socialism has been a term since long before the political compass test existed. It's a redundant term because socialism is inherently libertarian by nature.

What is there to fight on nostr for those people?

That's exactly it, you can't be both socialist and libertarian, but there are some here who call themselves that.

I don't really know, but they have an idea of ​​mixing libertarianism with a social political idea. There's a theory by Gramsci that teaches how to carry out a cultural revolution, so it's possible they'll try to incorporate their cultural revolution here.

Both capitalism and socialism are ambiguous terms

Incorrect. Socialism aka Marxism exchanged the former parasitical class with their own their vanguard party and selected friends and partners. The blood and energy drained from the valuable and productive plebs are extracted in the name of the "welfare" state. "Welfare" is the world communism of Friedrich Engels. What we understand and recognize as socialism, is Marxian socialism. The Marxist state in now cemented all over the world. We only have Marxism. Of course, Marxism is much worse for the national health than all other systems of the past because it is total in vision. Since the Marxist state is total in scope, it shall therefore be eradicated in its totality, which necessitates executing all Marxist state operatives across the board, including all professors, "doctors," psychiatrists, judges, magistrates, journalists, bankers, politicians, economists, teachers, et cetera. Socialism aka Marxism does not support the idea of voluntary exchange. Jew Marxism, including a social "democracy," is a parasite-slave system of gargantuan scope, and it is international in reach.

The terms capitalism and socialism are worn out relics of nineteenth century ideology. Both depend on centralization and political management. Capitalism, as it exists today, is not voluntary free exchange but a State protected hierarchy of corporate privileges, central banking, and legal monopolies. Socialism, in turn, replaces one master with another, trading the capitalist for the commissar, the market for the Ministry. Both are forms of centralized economics, where power flows downward and freedom upward only by permission. Neo-Agorism belongs to neither camp. It represents decentralized economics, an order of voluntary, bottom up cooperation. Not capitalism in the corporatist sense, not socialism in the collectivist sense, but a stateless market rooted in mutual exchange. The proper language of freedom is not “isms” but markets, real, living, spontaneous markets between free individuals.

Neo-Agorism Is Neither Capitalist Nor Socialist - Philippe Lemieux - IT, Design, Philosophy and Economics

The Case for an Evolutionary Market of Conscience Agorism was originally conceived by Samuel Edward Konkin III as a revolutionary counter economy, ...

To me Capitalism = free markets and private property Socialism = centrally planned economy and common property Todays western systems would in this regard best be described as "corporatism" where state and corporations are intertwined in governing

Socialism aka Marxism is psychopathic parasitism on a gigantic scale. There is no liberalism, libertarianism or democratic in Jew Marxism, including a social "democracy." Liberalism, libertarianism, democracy and capitalism presuppose that the plebs have property rights, which they do not have. These ideologies are just theories that have never materialized on planet Earth. Marxism, on the other hand, necessitates that the thralls do not have property rights. Jew Marxism is a parasite-slave system of epic proportions. The thralls have "welfare" instead of rights. "Welfare" is nothing but privileges. All privileges can be removed by the property owners aka the lawmakers, including "your" life, "your" children, pension, bank accounts, stocks, bonds, socks, guns, house, et cetera. What "welfare constitutes, is at all times decided by the pioneers of the revolution aka the vanguard party of the Marxist state.

Incorrect. Corporatism has nothing to do with the big corporations of today. Corporatism was a guild system where different branches of industry, farmers, craftsmen and other similar trades formed guilds/corporatives to best organize society. You are correct about capitalism. You are incorrect about socialism. There is no "common property" in Jew Marxism, including a social "democracy." A social "democracy" is incremental Marxism aka reform Marxism. Social "democracy" was concocted by Marxist Jews in 1860s, including Ferdinand Lassalle and Eduard Bernstein. FDR was a social "democrat." The population does not have property rights, which means they own nothing. Clearly, this conclusion is valid all throughout history and in all manifestations of the state up to this date. Today's system is to be firmly placed in the Marxist camp. All corporations, businesses and businessmen are owned by the owners of the Marxist state, which are the lawmakers. The banks in the United States and their accounts are fully owned by the POTUS and the U.S. Congress. There is no power outside of these two entities. For example, Donald Trump, who is a renowned Marxist parasite and a certified Jew-lover, owns Elon Musk, his children and all his bank accounts. King Charles III wields absolute power in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission currently own all the thralls of the European Union. Beneath the autocracies lie the Marxist state apparatus, which is total in scope.

Capitalism has never materialized on planet Earth, so I do not see a reason why this designation should be used. Capitalism requires that the people have property rights, which they do not have, so capitalism does not exist today. The same applies to liberalism and democracy. Corporations, businesses and businessmen exist exclusively on privileges granted by the property owners. The central banks are therefore owned by the property owners aka the lawmakers. The proto-Marxist, radical internationalist and steadfast Jew-lover Woodrow Wilson gave the Jew parasite and its partners in crime the privilege to issue money in 1913 when he hatched Federal Reserve. Banking is a privilege, and all privileges can be rescinded by the property owners, including the Federal Reserve system. Today we only have Marxism. What we identify as socialism, is Marxian socialism, and, unfortunately, Marxism is not a worn-out relic of the past. On the contrary, the destructive Jew creed of Marxism is currently the only system in operation today. Beneath the autocracies lie the Marxist state instruments.

*Beneath the autocracies lies the Marxist state instruments.

*Beneath the autocracies lies the Marxist state apparatus, which is total in scope.

Yes, that's exactly it, the pseudo "Democracy" model has become a true cooperative system. The government produces nothing, and the large producers, while remaining closer to a monopoly without actually being one, use the government, invest in both sides, and have support from both sides. In this case, the liberal economy always takes a back seat.

Yes, to me common property is the marketing term for state property in socialist ideology. Do you know a catchy term to describe the market situation in western democracies today?