When people say you have a humanitarian obligation to flood your country with immigrants, refugees or asylum seekers realize that “humanitarian obligation” is not a benign value but a mechanism of resource extraction applied to the host society itself. The moral obligation is marketed to populations so they absorb costs they would otherwise resist. In fact most mainstream political language is exactly this. A cover story for some type of theft.

Replies (23)

Wonder who is influencing them to say this.. My money is on the same people that say stuff like “diversity is our strength” “we need a colorblind meritocracy” “America a big melting pot” Google who popularized that last phrase and ask yourself why he said it. Also it’s not about resource extraction.
can we be more plain? Mass illegal immigration serves two purposes. To erase national identity because Globose hate it, and to increase the Democrat voter base/congressional seats because they no longer have enough organic support to win major elections without fraud.
Obama's clan hates America. Glenn Back called this way back in his Fox News days. You really think they were really trying to make insurance cheaper... That's what you were sold but not what happened. They plan was to have the plebs cover the cost for the illegals
When you say "flood" you're talking about people legally migrating. Blaming migrants for the corruption in your own government is the stupidest shit that anyone can do. Migrants are the ones who harvest your food for you, build your fucking houses for you, etc. Blaming migrants for your country being controlled by zionists is stupid
Humanitarian obligation is unequivocal bullshit. It's like someone getting mad at Elon Musk if he didn't give to the poor. It's like, well, how much good is he doing for not the poor? That's why I write books for extremely intelligent, intuitive people. It's okay to reject certain audiences for the sake of targeting another audience. It's okay to say, "We feel for you, we'll pray for you, we'll send some money your way, but you don't get to live in our house or our country. It wouldn't be humane to us. And, there's probably a reason your country is a shithole."
Also: Third world countries have the largest wealth gap of all counties. And therefore the largest “power gap”. There is no middle class. The lower class is too busy fighting amongst themselves and simply trying to survive to do anything meaningful. The West has already begun its decline- the middle class is shrinking fast. Bringing the third world to the first world will accelerate this. I can’t help but think this is intentional.
We no longer want their cheap labor and will bear whatever cost increases come with it. We will instead focus our efforts on automation. They must return to their own countries
Benking's avatar
Benking 5 months ago
Framing moral duty as a tool for cost-shifting is clever — true humanitarianism addresses root causes, not just markets compliance from a host society.
The West controls the world by the destabilizing it. And then gets pissed when people flood into their countries as they search for the control they have lost.
I'd say we should deport people which complain about immigrants, but considering you retards have elected a President who actually deports people without due process, I don't actually want to jokingly support the next psycho you retards elect.