100% and the other question is does that person actually ship or are the trying to scam?

the first time they scammed someone they'd get called out. generally it's only worthwhile trying to scam large sums on reputation-based markets.

Well, they might just get a bunch of orders stacked before that happens. Either way, a sign of success even if it's an unwanted one

true true

Hopefully @Oshi (推し) sees this Monero demand and changes his tune on Monero.

This isn’t a good start tbh

It’s turning me off even more. It’s gross.

I agree with you… Sorry for starting a kerfuffle…

Pac suggested maybe they are just payment proxying ie they receive Monero payment and then place the order with Oshi on behalf of the customer and DONT actually hold any of Oshis product. should still talk to Oshi first of course but it avoids the QC issues I mentioned and I'm not sure I'd say doing it was unethical or anything.... 🤔

Nah you did good bb thank you for looking out. Absolute soldier.

should probably consider this possibility @Oshi (推し) seems more likely unless you've received other large orders to a single address lately. they should still ask you to do it imo, but it's nothing you can prevent afaict either

Agreed. Find who this is and send them to Oshi office. We will chat

lol this was a fun one. lets hope for the best.

Seriously what's wrong with this? If someone purchases from you with fiat via strikes fiat to lightning rail, Strike is serving as the same thing acting as a proxy to another currency. People who use proxies with Monero do so for OPSEC reasons. I use xmrbazaar proxy sellets for Amazon for obvious reasons. You wouldn't have gotten their business either way and in this scenario you're getting more business than not. What business is yours if the proxy seller is buying for themselves or for someone else and taking Monero from it? I'm very curious about the backlash, they're not taking profit from you you're getting 100% of the sale. I'm open to your perspective I want to know what's offensive about it.

TBF at this point we were thinking they had bought a quantity of stock and were reselling that at least I was anyway

"Without their consent" is manipulative framing - it implies theft when this is just voluntary exchange. Once you sell something, the buyer owns it and can do whatever they want with it.

not if they want to continue having a relationship with the seller they cant. human relationships are usually more than transactional and therefore they dont end when the transaction is completed.

Not the case. Inventory is in still my control.

He's sticking dildos deep in his ass every day watching Saylors speeches and enjoys it a lot, but still can't assume who he is yet. That's why he's so obsessed about gay stuff all the time. Just mute fags like this, not worth wasting your time 👍🏻 "Freedom maximalist", except when people have different views on the world or Bitcoin, then "Go fuck yourself if you disagree with me". Classic.