you have a lot of new slides and images, cool that way people understand it a little better what kind of tools are you using for making the whole vid? looks like a lot of work to me!

No but bip 110 might be

“Bitcoin can exist without crypto, crypto can’t exist without Bitcoin” 🔥🔥🔥

#bitcoin View quoted note →

Because we aren’t Jews that enjoy storing CSAM.

"No me importa si es o no un golpe, lo importante es que es único y no tiene igual. No hay nada más sólido y descentralizado que Bitcoin."

Bitcoin’s "scam" narrative often misses its evolving institutional role. It’s speculative, sure, but flows into Bitcoin ETFs suggest structural demand—not just hype. I read an analysis projecting how ETF adoption could reshape price dynamics by 2026.

The Board

Bitcoin ETF Flows: Price Dynamics in 2026

Explore Bitcoin ETF flows and price dynamics in 2026. Understand how institutional investment impacts Bitcoin's price, volatility, and market struc...

Bitcoin is not cryptoshit.

Correct. I’m not some Jew that enjoys the CSAM.

Great work Matthew as always! The Timechain will sort out who are the greater fools!

What if none of the people we trust read the white paper lolll

BIP 110 is one of the most important protocol improvements in the history of BTC. It’s essentially a rejection of Core - they have been accepting VCFunds (even proven to have received funds from Epstien through a cut out) and allowing them to influence and alter the code- making changes that allow for inscriptions, runes, memecoins and even a stablecoin to be embedded permanently on chain. The issue with this is that it centralizes nodes - it becomes so bloated that one cannot easily install on a basic laptop. The more nodes and accessible to the average person - the safer the system becomes. There’s also social issues with core - maintainers were chosen based on race and gender instead of merit and because of this Core v30 was rushed and delivered before it was ready - it had bugs which deleted wallets and bitcoin was lost. This is a hostile act that must be met with resistance. It’s not controversial that Bitcoin should be purely money with no data storage uses. That’s what Satoshi intended. That’s what BIP 110 sets out to do. Core is using complex excuses and propaganda to protect their funding. They do not listen to the node runners and their requests. *ps don’t listen to the haters here - even bip110ers don’t really understand sometimes and will say stupid things and make ad hominem attacks - sorry for that

Better educate yourself on BIP 110 because currently you make 0 sense.

So do nothing and let them spammers win ?

Are you asking about the spammers, scammers and the shitcoiners who want to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum 2.0 and only care about their grift?

If the network were 50% core v25 and 50% knots BIP110 would be ideal.

The truth is that race and gender SHOULD be used to determine who works in core. The same race and gender as those who created bitcoin.

I would like more options than even that.

I concur. At least 3. There is maybe room for 5.

race is a social construct. gender is not.

If you think the Knots is compromised in some way I’m interested to see some evidence. It’s still a new client, and will need to be as decentralized as possible as time goes on - but the main issue is with Core. Knots was made in response to chain bloat and hierarchy within core. Core in fact does not align with Satoshi’s vision. There is no where in the white paper or forums where you could make the case for non monetary data (memecoins, stables, inscription spam and runes) on the base layer. The only use for this alteration was for VC funds and companies to profit off using BTC as data storage. We do not need NFTs or $dog on top of Bitcoin and Core enabled this on purpose - for fiat profit. What we really need isnodes to easily download the time chain, with as much upfront cost and little bloat as possible - or else it will be centralized like every other crypto. Honestly that’s up to the individual to decide. That’s how consensus works. Read the BIP. Read what Adam back and Core are saying. One is clear that Bitcoin should have zero non monetary use cases - the other uses complex reasoning and appeal to authority to confuse the masses on their real intention.

lmao... yes. faggot is entirely sufficient!

look at the spastic cunt go 🤣🤣 you tic like youve got tourettes

oh look, I've got a stalker 🤣🤣🤣 come on little puppy, there's a good buddy boy.

It’s really this simple: Answer the question: how much data should be allocated to do anything you want? could be 0 could be 4mb or anything in between. answer that, run software that aligns with it, and deliberately participate in sustaining bitcoin’s consensus. I trust individuals acting in their self interest will form a better consensus than any individual.