I see a broader picture... It's all a globalist game of "bad guys" - "good guys", but in the end they all work together to flock the heard into total slavery by consent... And you are right: using Bitcoin is how we can stop them !

Please always look very carefully at where the money comes from. SimpleX Chat received 380,000 dollars from Village Global. This is the venture capital company of Jef Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, ect. This means that big tech companies have already long been involved in SimpleX Chat! See https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/simplex-chat and

Village Global VC | Early-Stage Venture Capital with Top Entrepreneurs

Village Global backs early-stage startups with funding, mentorship, and networks from some of the world’s most successful entrepreneurs and inves...

Do your want real privacy? Don´t use SimpleX. Better switch to Threema from Switzerland. Check it for yourself: Visit

Secure Messaging Apps Comparison | Privacy Matters

This site compares secure messaging apps from a security & privacy point of view. These include Facebook Messenger, iMessage, Skype, Signal, Simple...

Rate: 🟩=3 🟨=1 🟥=0 Results (and where the money comes from) 1. Threema = 86 = most secure Messenger (User pays one-time) 2. Signal (OTF / Brian Acton / Ex-WhatsApp) = 80 3. Session (Loki Coin & suspicious Chinese) = 77 4. Wire (Janus Fries / Ex-Skype) = 68 5. SimpleX Chat *= 67 6. Wickr (Amazon) = 61 7. Element / Matrix (Amdocs / Morris Kahn) = 56 8. Apple iMessage (Hardware sales) = 37 9. WhatsApp (Meta) = 32 10. Google Messages (Ads) = 28 11. Telegram (Putin) = 27 12. Facebook Messenger (Meta) = 26 13. Microsoft Skype =10 * SimpleX Chat got 380.000 $ from VillageGlobal.vc = Jez Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, ect. OFT = OpenTechnologyFund = US-Goverment

I see that you have little understanding of protocols 😂

SimpleX Chat don´t know how many servers they have! Then they also don't know who is behind some servers! This provides a large attack surface for collecting metadata. The big tech companies only need the IP address and they know which user it is. How do they do that? 85% of all smartphones use Google's Android and this sends encrypted data packets to Google every day. This means that Google knows the IP address of every user. Amazon (online shopping monopolist in Western countries) knows the names & addresses of users (if an order was recently placed with the IP) Microsoft (operating system monopolist worldwide) knows the IP of the home computer and Internet router. This is the reason why it is insanely dangerous to get involved with money from big tech companies. They don't put their money into SimpleX because the logo looks so great, but because they want a “foot in the door” and data. PS: The same goes for Signal, they also run all their traffic through Google, Amazon, Microsoft & Cloudflare. What does Threema's server do? It only stores messages until they have been successfully delivered to the recipient and then deletes them again. The message is then overwritten by new messages on the server disk. This means that the deleted message cannot be recovered. This seems to me to be a much safer way than using a service like SimpleX, where the operators don't even know who is behind their server.

Fuck what a propaganda bot from Threema, go to ignore. Post: did you know that threema is a honeypot?

According to the justice system, Telegram's lack of moderation, cooperation with law enforcement and the tools offered by Telegram, makes it an accomplice to drug trafficking, crimes against minors and fraud. It's well fucked, the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse fiat against privacy: - Drugs - Money Laundering - Pederasty - Terrorism They have applied 3 out of 4. View quoted note →

Since you specifically suggested two decentralized solutions with Bitcoin and nostr, "keet" (https://keet.io/) would be a suitable messenger.

The problem with Keet is that it has serious privacy deficiencies.

Amen

That's what everyone always says when they run out of arguments. Honeypot? Don't make me laugh... Then also provide verifiable evidence for this lie?

欧美的左祸对言论自由的打击是显而易见的，欧美尤其是美国本来是言论自由的堡垒和灯塔，可惜左祸太猛百姓太弱，现在确实是要为全球性的1984做些准备了。 View quoted note →

The analysis of securemessagingapps is totally incorrect, read the thread. As for threema being a honeypot, I'll simply tell you, can you tell what code they run on their servers?

X (formerly Twitter)

SimpleX Chat (@SimpleXChat) on X

https://t.co/wzZtJ0Esyk by @securemess is the great comparison of messaging apps, but there are several incorrect statements about @SimpleXChat the...

How?

This is not proof.... I have described above what their servers do. And in the last (almost) 12 years, there has never been the slightest doubt that this is the case!

Metadata and network traceability, you can easily create a communication graph. If you want a more private p2p application try berty, but Simplex is still superior from a privacy point of view.

GitHub

simplex-chat/docs/SIMPLEX.md at stable · simplex-chat/simplex-chat

SimpleX - the first messaging network operating without user identifiers of any kind - 100% private by design! iOS, Android and desktop apps 📱! ...

If you already start from lies with the Simplex protocol, what do you expect me to argue with you? You have relied on securemessaginapp's analysis which is totally incorrect. And you show that you have no idea how the Simplex protocol works, end of conversation.

Where can I find out more about the network traceability and the communication graph?

This is a "vulnerability" specific to all p2p networks. It is intrinsic to their operation, otherwise they would not be distributed networks. P2p networks are not good at offering privacy.

FOLLOW THE MONEY and the Servers! Then the protocol doen´t matter.....

I don't yet understand, how someone can use the encrypted information that I send to a peer.

The problem is not the content of the message that is effectively encrypted, the problem is the metadata that is generated or that can be ascertained through the communication network. For example imagine that you live in a totalitarian regime, you are A and if you talk to person B you are dead. In signal we cannot see the content of what A talks with B, but if we know that A has talked with B, the server knows them, you are dead. In P2P networks if they do not use some kind of routing type tor as session, we can find out if A talks to B as would be the case of Keet, although you can not know the content of the messages because they are encrypted if you can know that they have spoken to each other, you're dead. With Simplex you can not know that A has spoken to B, simply because there is no such persistent identity and also the sending of messages is rotating between different servers, add also that there is now routing of messages so it is impossible to know where the message comes from. Therefore you can neither know the content of messages nor can you know that A has spoken to B.

Thanks for the explanation.

Other Freedom Technologies are #Gnu/Linux, #Torrents, 3D Printers, #LightningWallets (not all of them as some may be easier to be attacked by fascistic govs)

SimpleX Chat don´t know how many servers they have! Then they also don't know who is behind some servers! This provides a large attack surface for collecting metadata. The big tech companies only need the IP address and they know which user it is. How do they do that? 85% of all smartphones use Google's Android and this sends encrypted data packets to Google every day. This means that Google knows the IP address of every user. Amazon (online shopping monopolist in Western countries) knows the names & addresses of users (if an order was recently placed with the IP) Microsoft (operating system monopolist worldwide) knows the IP of the home computer and Internet router. This is the reason why it is insanely dangerous to get involved with money from big tech companies. They don't put their money into SimpleX because the logo looks so great, but because they want a “foot in the door” and data. PS: The same goes for Signal, they also run all their traffic through Google, Amazon, Microsoft & Cloudflare. What does Threema's server do? It only stores messages until they have been successfully delivered to the recipient and then deletes them again. The message is then overwritten by new messages on the server disk. This means that the deleted message cannot be recovered. This seems to me to be a much safer way than using a service like SimpleX, where the operators don't even know who is behind their server.

Globalists invest in privacy? SimpleX Chat is an open source messenger, which was conceived in privacy, keeping the anonymity of the users and without access to their data, but, in July 2022, SimpleX Chat secured seed funding from venture capital fund Village Global. In July 2022 SimpleX Chat raised a pre-seed funding from the VC fund Village Global. Village Global VC fund is Gates-Bezos-Zuckerberg. Do you think these three characters want your privacy? Sources: 1. simplex.chat/blog/20230422-… 2. villageglobal.vc A lot of money from venture capitalists investing in Simplex, a "simple" startup. Do they all have a strong conviction for privacy? What is the interest of globalist angel investors? More money coming in... Jack Dorsey and Asymmetric Capital Partners

SimpleX network: the investment from Jack Dorsey and Asymmetric, v6.0 released with the new user experience and private message routing.

Why not just setup an XMPP server and use a FOSS client instead?

XMMP is not private, metadata is exploitable.

Even if the data server is run by yourself?

The other servers on the network still generate metadata, XMPP was not designed with privacy in mind. The metadata shows who you talked to and at what time. On the other hand, setting up a SimpleX server is even easier and no metadata is generated.

XMPP is not a private messaging platform. It was specifically designed to be an open platform. Different components have been strapped on over time in an attempt to increase its privacy and security, but its foundation is simply not based on the notion of protecting user privacy. It certainly has its uses, but it shouldn't be considered an alternative to platforms that were built on the concept of privacy and anonymity.

To be fair, looks like he’s right about SimpleX, they did receive funding from Gates, Bezos and the Zuckerborg