Replies (16)

Never loaded it. The guy is a jerk... “Right now the only options would be Bitcoin dies or we have to trust someone,” Dashjr writes. The proposed solution would require a consensus change, activating a Bitcoin hardfork.
MRbtc's avatar
MRbtc 7 months ago
Divide to conquer. People don’t learn do they? I keep running my old core node. Tic toc next block.
Neil Young ? Are you some kind of a fucking Boomer ? You realize as a pedophile i only date Teens, right ? ( or at least girls who can pass off for a Teen when i'm drunk )
Robert Greene teaches never to make fun of or belittle other people's taste, sense of humor etc. But come on let's be real - this "music" is trash. LOL here, listen to some music that doesn't suck:
I run Knots because: - I want full control over MY node. I want to determine which transactions enter MY mempool and which are relayed. Core doesn't offer me this level of control, which is why I switched to Knots. Whether the leaked private chat messages from Luke are true or false is irrelevant to me. I only care about the code I'm running If Luke were to release an update that would result in a hard fork, I simply wouldn't update. A hard fork is not a solution. Therefore, NO, I will NOT delete Knots.