That's my stage name. Nice work!

This came out awesome.

Love this. Always thought the moon system in Avatar was fantastic.

Haha showed this the misses, she liked it.

The magnetic field that close to a gas giant would cook those people

Clark Moody's dashboard is a critical piece of infrastructure for the discerning Bitcoiner, but does he do podcasts? Open invite, Clark... 🔶👀

Nice ✔️

these absurdly large and close celestial objects are popular pulp book cover style :)

It does look awesome, though. Maybe there's a megastructure in orbit changing the shape of the magnetic field so that orbit it safe.

Crap. My mind won't let it go. Now its yammering on about huge tidal waves.

Beautiful artwork

well, i think that this meme relates to the perceptual distortion you see with near-horizon moon. you can't catch that with a camera, but it's subjectively the image that comes out of your visual cortex. so, probably, at the distance that a jupiter like planet could actually be at, could possibly be apprehended by human eyes exactly as depicted. just shrink those stupid planets down, put them near the horizon, and make them the same size as you see the moon at the horizon. then the unreality factor disappears.

come to think of it, it's such a simple transform that you probably can make an on-device AI transformer that does the "how it looks to a human eye" transform. it's not the only one either. the entire distant field in a landscape is distorted by the visual cortex. cameras make everything look further away, that the brain perceives as being bigger

hey, that close to jupiter would be exactly that. go read up on the giant volcano that is the largest ever recorded on, i think it was Io

Corinna Kopf’s manager tricked her saying the stream wasn’t live yet and she leaked by accident…👀 👇

Redirect

I think that's right. I think gravity and distance uses the same inverse square law as radiation, just expressed differently in the equation - m1 + m2 / distance square? I guess I'll look it up... Okay, close, gotta multiply all that by G, but yeah, so you can imagine the intensity of the gradient changing similarly with light from a star, so cutting the distance in half increases gravity by 4x, doubling it reduces gravity to 1/4, etc. Idk if the distance would be enough if it appears the same as the moon does to us, but it seems plausible if you compare it with that picture, so like maybe a 10x reduction in visible size would be bla 100x reduction in gravity. Right? I just woke up. I'm drinking coffee again. I'll quit again after I've healed from the stroke.

you should try carnitine. it has similar effects from the opposite direction. caffeine is broken down into several other chemicals in the liver, one of them is paraxanthine, which triggers increased fat -> ketone metabolism. carnitine does it from teh other side because that's what carnitine is for. in my opinion if a planet the size of jupiter were visible as the moon is to us, but at a safe distance, it would be outside the range where it would cause a big problem, but it would cause stuff to happen a lot more, regardless, both magnetic and gravitic. the image is just too big, you wouldn't render the moon that big, the moon looks big near the horizon (and sun) but not *that* big. in fact you might say that the sun itself is pretty much a body with proportion in similar range. that reminds me of something, isn't it interesting that from where we are, the moon and sun are about the same radius. i mean almost literally dead on, total solar eclipse you literally see only the corona, none of the face.

Claude Monet right?